Home > Puma (Tdci) > Puma 09 with contaminated fuel |
|
|
sasha2001 Member Since: 02 Jan 2009 Location: New Zealand+ russia Posts: 206 |
exactly fuel filtering system is NOT sufficient for purpose, TD% had more filters and no problems, they have cheapened it up and located the breather in the most stupid position which is basic, any 1st year engineering student would see the problem see this Link : http://www.aulro.com/afvb/90-110-130-defen...orrow.html Look under the name dullbird who started the thread, they has the same problem and got Landrover to back down, 'Sold fit for purpose" springs to mind here and if the engineering is not right for the pipe to ingress water during road driving and not having a adequate fuel filtering system like TD5 which has more filters in the line etc they are liable also you are backed up as it is a acknowleged dault by Landrover See this link below so they are liable http://www.aulro.com/afvb/90-110-130-defen...rds-3.html Read here and search fuel problems, rough idle in the forums the heading on page 3 service recall "rough idle Breather location so they are admitting a problem here First thing I did was put extra pipe on the fuel breather to snorkel height Heard of the same problem witha new Toyota 70 series v8 which gor water in the fuel system, they said no but pointed out it was "not fit for purpose" as sold for off road use etc (in realitly it was water in the fuel from the farm tank!!) Fuel rail etc, pump was above $30000 NZ but when mentioned lawyers, consumer TV program and the car guide Dog and lemon guide they backed down!!! Also I Know here in New Zeland some Car insurance policies will cover Accidental damage which covers things like this, they will then pressure Landrover good Luck |
||
4th Jul 2009 6:12am |
|
sasha2001 Member Since: 02 Jan 2009 Location: New Zealand+ russia Posts: 206 |
see here also how stupid the breather pipe position is
http://images.google.co.nz/imgres?imgurl=h...n%26sa%3DG |
||
4th Jul 2009 6:16am |
|
Grockle Member Since: 24 Nov 2008 Location: Peak District National Park Posts: 2266 |
Some ins companies here will cover miss fills so water in the fuel would also be covered,have you checked your Oz policy ? 2.4 90 XS
1968 1/32 scale Britains 109 Pick up. |
||
4th Jul 2009 9:09am |
|
mse Member Since: 06 Apr 2008 Location: UK Posts: 5035 |
Some other points - you dont need a special tool to reprime - i know a few who have done it without.
Second - the fuel breather is not the only problem (although there have been some cracked and split) but the fuel filler cap is also a breather in effect and can let water in there. Either way - land rover can be a , but have paid our previously. Mike |
||
4th Jul 2009 5:22pm |
|
alantd Member Since: 14 Dec 2008 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 1513 |
Re: fuel filler cap.
I've got a "Defendoor" over mine (search for relevant threads) and this might be an added benefit. One that started out as a 2.4 TDCi 110 XS + New Defender 110 First Edition |
||
6th Jul 2009 7:45am |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis