↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Technical > Mud Glorious Mud
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
Milligan



Member Since: 07 Dec 2007
Location: Somerset
Posts: 32

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Java Black
Mud Glorious Mud
I drove off the black stuff through some deep mud into a field up hill, with some speed until everything ground to a halt! Got out and went shooting, home time came and all and sundry with their various Disco, Defender variants decided that I would need to reverse, turn and go out the way I came instead of driving up the muddy field and leaving by the top gate, I agreed that was probably what was going to happen with what are almost totally road tyres fitted... However I flicked the diff lock on, high ratio, no revs and let the clutch out, To everyone’s surprise including my Farmer passengers we just drove straight up the hill. The gob smacked comment of 'F$%@ me that's impressive' sums up the general reaction.

What surprised me was that the Traction Control worked with the diff lock engaged - I had thought that it would not work, or work against the diff lock, there was the bang bang of the traction control. From the outside it looked good with a few comments about seeing the wheels slip and then stop and the steady slow assent... everyone was impressed…

Question, can someone actually explain how the two devices work together? And why when I drove in to the field at speed why the TC seemed not to do anything?

If you have a new one (with TC) and never tried pushing your luck off road do it - I was surprised at how clever this system is, there would have been little chance of my old 90 (without TC) having made it up such a wet clay muddy hill without making a mess and trying several times and with speed!

90 XS CSW... Worthy of all high praise Bow down Bow down Bow down
Post #954 17th Dec 2007 9:16pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
AndrewS



Member Since: 10 Apr 2007
Location: Hereford
Posts: 3707

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 130 Puma 2.2 SW Rimini Red
Diff Lock and TC do not work together in fact the TC does not control the engine power either. This may be the reason for diff failure Whistle

I expect that on your way into the field you had enough momentum to carry you through and all 4 wheels could have been turning at the same speed. The TC will only work when you have one or more of the wheels spinning faster than the others. The drive will always take the path of least resistance so the TC will then apply the brakes to the wheels that are spinning faster forcing the drive to the wheels with grip. I think it applies the brakes 7 times a second. I also think that the Defender TC only works across the axles so you have a front and rear TC unlike the D3 which monitors all 4 wheels.
Post #956 17th Dec 2007 9:56pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Milligan



Member Since: 07 Dec 2007
Location: Somerset
Posts: 32

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Java Black
I guess I meant that they worked at the same time instead of as one system... Does this mean that the diff lock is between front and rear axles as opposed to locking the axle diff, then the TC controls each axle, thus you have the same power front and rear and then each left right wheel is controled by the TC?

Can see what you mean if it's the axle diff locked then the TC will strain the diff... That's why I thought that they did not function at the same time... Rolling Eyes Idea
Post #957 18th Dec 2007 10:07am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Milligan



Member Since: 07 Dec 2007
Location: Somerset
Posts: 32

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Java Black
Been doing some research via Google and have found a couple of points... the first was that if all 4 wheels slip then traction control i.e. the slowing the wheel bit - in the Defender case applying the brake can't work. On more complex systems it reduce engine torque. So in my case because I was being brave not sensible I ground to a halt with all four wheels spinning! Then when I decided to pull away employing diff lock I gave front and rear axles equal torque and then TC applied brakes left and right etc., to brake a slipping wheel, hence we just drove up the hill...

On the diff front whilst it adds the load it can't stop that load being transferred to a wheel as they only break one wheel at a time... more complex systems do both by reducing engine output as well. Maybe it's that transfer of load from one wheel to the other that is busting the diffs.

Thanks Andrew, your insight was enough to understand the explanation I found. If anyone thinks this is wrong lets hear it but I think it's probably accurate and explains my scenario... Thumbs Up

It was still bloody impressive Now:- 90 XS CSW Java Black
Then:- 90 CSW Oxford Blue
Post #960 18th Dec 2007 9:17pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
AndrewS



Member Since: 10 Apr 2007
Location: Hereford
Posts: 3707

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 130 Puma 2.2 SW Rimini Red
Or another way of putting it. Razz

The Defender is equiped with a centre diff lock as standard.

The centre differential lock literally locks out the differential action between the front and rear axles and forces drive to be split equally between each axle for maximum traction.
So a centre diff lock helps to maintain drive to some of the wheels even if one axle has lost traction.

Electronic Traction Control uses the same hardware as the Anti-lock Braking System to ensure drive is delivered to the ground in slippery conditions.

If ETC detects that one or more wheels are accelerating faster than the others:- it is a sign of wheel-spin. When wheel-spin is detected, ETC applies the brakes to the spinning wheel(s) and slows it down. By slowing the wheel(s) down the ETC system prevents all the drive 'escaping' through this wheel and drive transfer to the ground is maintained.

In the Defender, ETC compares wheel speeds from side to side only.
Post #973 19th Dec 2007 4:28pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Milligan



Member Since: 07 Dec 2007
Location: Somerset
Posts: 32

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Java Black
This is spot on very clear...

Thanks Andrew Bow down Now:- 90 XS CSW Java Black
Then:- 90 CSW Oxford Blue
Post #976 20th Dec 2007 9:57am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jst



Member Since: 14 Jan 2008
Location: Taunton
Posts: 8008

 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Stornoway Grey
i though 07MY TC worked between the axles as well not just across them. will have to do some reading up. Cheers

James
110 2012 XS Utility
130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper
90 2010 Hardtop
90 M57 1988 Hardtop
Post #1070 14th Jan 2008 2:45pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
AndrewS



Member Since: 10 Apr 2007
Location: Hereford
Posts: 3707

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 130 Puma 2.2 SW Rimini Red
AndrewS wrote:


In the Defender, ETC compares wheel speeds from side to side only.


A Land Rover Statement Thumbs Up
Post #1072 14th Jan 2008 2:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jst



Member Since: 14 Jan 2008
Location: Taunton
Posts: 8008

 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Stornoway Grey
AndrewS wrote:
AndrewS wrote:


In the Defender, ETC compares wheel speeds from side to side only.


A Land Rover Statement Thumbs Up


from where?

also to add to above, accelerating improves the responsiveness of TC Cheers

James
110 2012 XS Utility
130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper
90 2010 Hardtop
90 M57 1988 Hardtop
Post #1073 14th Jan 2008 2:52pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jst



Member Since: 14 Jan 2008
Location: Taunton
Posts: 8008

 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Stornoway Grey
Yep - just looked it up, as the man says its across the axles only not between them. Cheers

James
110 2012 XS Utility
130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper
90 2010 Hardtop
90 M57 1988 Hardtop
Post #1075 14th Jan 2008 3:15pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
AndrewS



Member Since: 10 Apr 2007
Location: Hereford
Posts: 3707

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 130 Puma 2.2 SW Rimini Red
jst wrote:
also to add to above, accelerating improves the responsiveness of TC


Thumbs Up
Post #1076 14th Jan 2008 3:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Milligan



Member Since: 07 Dec 2007
Location: Somerset
Posts: 32

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Java Black
jst wrote:
accelerating improves the responsiveness of TC


Yep, in some respects this is correct in that the/a wheel is more likely to spin when accelerating (more revs). Also when a wheel spins it's accelerating compared to it's partner wheel. So YES in both cases the wheel will accelerate and TC is more likely to respond.

However, I think you'll find that more revs does not mean your ability to move forward is improved - not slipping the wheels (the least response from TC) is the best way forward... Try it, you'll find that pulling away, you'll get to a point where a wheel slips, more revs much beyond this do nothing to aid traction. Now:- 90 XS CSW Java Black
Then:- 90 CSW Oxford Blue
Post #1077 14th Jan 2008 3:55pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
jst



Member Since: 14 Jan 2008
Location: Taunton
Posts: 8008

 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Stornoway Grey
Hi Milligan, yes but not quite how i meant it

By accelerating the wheel speed differentiation across the axle is greater therefore TC will bite the spinning wheel quicker and harder therefore the power is redirected through the diff to the wheel that has traction quicker.

i agree with your comment, regarding speed and traction; the most traction is just above stall Cheers

James
110 2012 XS Utility
130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper
90 2010 Hardtop
90 M57 1988 Hardtop
Post #1079 14th Jan 2008 4:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums