![]() | Home > Puma (Tdci) > Making a Puma engine last 200k |
![]() ![]() |
|
|
steveww Member Since: 05 Jan 2022 Location: Malton Posts: 577 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I have a OBD reader showing engine data, mainly temperatures. When pulling up hill in 6th gear at low RPM the temps shoot up; not so good for the engine. I always change down, more revs, more oil and coolant flow equals lowers temps.
I also use Millers diesel additive on most tank fill ups. Which reminds me I need to get some more. |
||
![]() |
|
jim4244 Member Since: 13 Apr 2014 Location: Bedfordshire Posts: 853 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Personally I think that the quality of the engine oil, make of filter (oil, fuel & air) and frequency of oil and filter changes are the main factor that dictate engine longlivity.
I only use Castrol Magnatec A5 oil and when it comes to filters I only fit genuine Land Rover or Mann. Engine service is 5000 miles or yearly. I also change the fuel and air filter at the same time. I know that this is overkill but filters are cheaper than replacement engines.. Does anyone on here add any oil additives? Jim |
||
![]() |
|
Oldyellar Member Since: 04 Sep 2015 Location: Central Posts: 406 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I had a 2.2 transit tipper it was remapped but it was really economical as well as fast. A year or so after remapping I done a mpg run over a few days trying to achieve max mpg and like a fool labouring the engine. It holed a piston. These engines are van engines made to reved, made to fly up and down streets in 2nd gear doing delivery's. I'll never make that mistake again.
|
||
![]() |
|
Julie Member Since: 07 Oct 2017 Location: Nantes Posts: 553 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Most of the early Pumas for sale in the internet are near or even above 200 K - Transit vans of that âge have even higher mileages. Very few did in deed replace engines / injectors So a more recent Puma should perform like so |
||
![]() |
|
BrickBox Member Since: 05 Oct 2021 Location: Wales Posts: 883 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It’s just typical internet talk where only the failed ones make threads. There are millions of these transit engines in vehicles over the world. We are talking a tiny % of failures in the total. 2008 2.4 110 Utility Station Wagon XS.
|
||
![]() |
|
hank Member Since: 12 Sep 2016 Location: South Wales Posts: 2316 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What clutch is this bw? the Transit 4x4 one SACHS 3000 950 727 ? > 110 XS Double Cab |
||
![]() |
|
blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 17603 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No, it is actually a Genuine Parts one bought probably c.2015, by which time LR had more or less managed to remember how to make a driven plate. It has lasted a lot longer than I expected, and has had very little springiness for quite some time.
I already have its replacement waiting for when the time comes, which is a Transit 4x4 clutch. |
||
![]() |
|
custom90 Member Since: 21 Jan 2010 Location: South West, England. Posts: 20617 ![]() ![]() |
I’m happy with mine the Sachs one, I has quite bad luck with the LR ones, they just didn’t last but also included slave failure which was the 2.4 original fitment. The 2.2 system seems better. Touch wood. Chillin In The Backwoods🇬🇧🇺🇸
⛽️🛢️⚙️🧰💪 |
||
![]() |
|
Julie Member Since: 07 Oct 2017 Location: Nantes Posts: 553 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 2.2 clutch really is "better". I had to replace the the master. But I'm still on my original 2012 clutch and 150K. 2 independant mécanos confirmed that I do not have to replace witin the next 2 years (after test drive).
|
||
![]() |
|
o4dn Member Since: 08 Jan 2010 Location: South West Posts: 555 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
150k km or miles? FWIW, my MY2009 Puma 2.4 Defender 90 is still on its original clutch (short of 120k km) “A Land Rover immobilized is a moral defeat for the driver and bad publicity for the vehicle, […] it's up to you to do justice to your Land Rover!” - Land Rover Driving Technique. -- 2009 2.4 Puma Defender 90 SW 1979 Land Rover Series 3 88" Last edited by o4dn on 8th Feb 2025 7:41am. Edited 1 time in total |
||
![]() |
|
Oldyellar Member Since: 04 Sep 2015 Location: Central Posts: 406 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I.think the puma is a very good engine I've had them since 2000 when the first 2.4s and 2.0 came out in the transit the 2.4s back then where tddi rather than tdci and had a bosch vp fuel pump that was basically the same fuel pump as the 300tdo uses. Puma is probably the best engine ever fitted to a transit. |
||
![]() |
|
Julie Member Since: 07 Oct 2017 Location: Nantes Posts: 553 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The 2.5 DI on the Transit MK2 is a very good engine, too.
https://www.curbsideclassic.com/blog/cc-gl...ansit-bus/ |
||
![]() |
|
90 Dreamer Member Since: 13 Jul 2019 Location: Oop North Posts: 2188 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
just exceptionally slow............
|
||
![]() |
|
Oldyellar Member Since: 04 Sep 2015 Location: Central Posts: 406 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Very good engine the Di love the crackle off them. Just horrendously slow and were outdated by 2000 when they were discontinued |
||
![]() |
|
![]() ![]() |
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2fc76/2fc76eb87c57c530863e00647a143cb9521bcd96" alt=""