Home > Maintenance & Modifications > MT82 6spd gearbox oil change |
|
|
macfrank Member Since: 05 Nov 2015 Location: somewhere in the north Posts: 1082 |
Can confirm 35Nm on MT82 drain plug is ok with a copper washer (workshop did that; I don‘t think there was a washer from factory). |
||
7th Jan 2025 9:59pm |
|
Ianh Member Since: 17 Sep 2018 Location: Essex Posts: 2070 |
Could you elaborate more on the statement ”After a bit of researching and on good authority I have confirmed that 2.2lite of oil is for all TDCi’s ” please.
I ask as in the owners handbook for the 2.2 it does state 2.4Litres on refill and when I drained the oil from the MT82 on my 2013 2.2 Puma I measured exactly 2.4Litres. Noting that I can guarantee that it was the very first time the oil had been replaced since it rolled off the production line. Ps Not trying to start an argument, just trying to get to the definitive answer. PPS I don’t expect an extra 200ml of oil will be detrimental to the gearbox, so it’s more about my OCD than any engineering concerns on my part. Click image to enlarge |
||
7th Jan 2025 10:44pm |
|
Zed Member Since: 07 Oct 2017 Location: In the woods Posts: 3332 |
Interestingly the MT82 in the Ford Mustang takes 2.7 quarts which equates to 2.55 litres in English.
I’ve always used 2.2l in my 2.4. Never bothered with exact torque, you can feel when it’s tightened correctly. Anyone know what is recommended in the Transit? WARNING. This post may contain sarcasm. |
||
8th Jan 2025 12:37am |
|
andy63 Member Since: 30 Jun 2023 Location: north east Posts: 560 |
When i first bought my 2.2tdci 110 I did a full service..all the oils..
I had the box filled to the level plug ..because that's what I'd been used to doing .. I can't remember how long i drove it around like that before reading a post most probably on here pointing me in right direction.. It was certainly for months and I can't recall any issues ..but I did drain and refill to the correct quantity eventually..😳🤣 |
||
8th Jan 2025 8:52am |
|
MK Member Since: 28 Aug 2008 Location: Santiago Posts: 2433 |
I can say all MT82 gearboxes on Defenders from 2007 up to the end are identical, except a minor change in the rod shifts mechanism, all located at the top of the internals.
Did JLR change their mids from 2.2 to 2.4 liters refill capacity because they thought it would be beneficial for the gearbox overall? I doubt it. Mustangs and other vehicles using MT82 gearboxes have different casings and different gear ratios. MT82 is kind of a generic designation. Early posts on this forum suggested that refilling with 2.4 liters may lead to overheat or issues by blowing input or output seals. Not my words though. Puma 110" SW ............................................................. Earth first. Other planets later |
||
8th Jan 2025 11:03am |
|
custom90 Member Since: 21 Jan 2010 Location: South West, England. Posts: 20504 |
I had asked Dave @ Ashcroft Transmissions who agreed that 35NM for the drain was more sensible than 50NM.
And also, I asked about the 2.2 vs 2.4litre debate for the MT82 that was on here, and Dave said that it was 2.2Litre for all MT82 Transmissions. So if LR did put anything different, I’m satisfied 2.2Litres for all MT82 Gearboxes is ideal. I think it just got slightly confused due to the similar wording regards engine size. So it is 2.2Litre Oil Capacity for ALL 2007 - 2016 Puma Defender MT82 6spd Gearboxes. Dave knows his stuff, on balance, I was likely to go for 2.2litre qty anyway, but like some of you I was curious about it all and if LR did something else, but, as Dave is a Transmissions Expert I believe he is right. Which was why I thought I would ask. With the LT230 I just filled to filler, just like the Diffs which is basically the qty stated anyway. But as most of you know the MT82 should be measured precisely. Regards oils, I’ve gone Castrol throughout using this link: https://www.castrol.com/en_gb/united-kingd...p;id=47682 (If you can find the same as I see, you can see service fill is listed as 2.2Litre). Oil brand etc is personal choice, I was using Fuchs before which was good, but I do like the Castrol which I have now. I have mine fully serviced almost now, I just have the MT82 actually to do imminently. Hopefully the info stated is useful. In the Castrol link, 2.4Litres is stated as dry fill, so that would be first fill from the factory, then the subsequent changes after that all 2.2litre which makes a lot of sense, probably so that when fist filled the level is that bit higher to cover the components that are not at the lowest point, after that, 2.2 litre is fine on-going. Perhaps the only other exception might be if the MT82 was removed and drained completely and stored, then it perhaps would lead to needing a dry fill. But 2.2Litre is the service fill, 99% of the time this is the go to. No Guts, No Glory. 🇬🇧🏴🏴🏴🇮🇪🇺🇸⛽️🛢️⚙️🧰💪 |
||
8th Jan 2025 8:31pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis