↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Technical > tyres
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 3 123>
Print this entire topic · 
The Boy



Member Since: 28 Aug 2008
Location: East Northants
Posts: 1459

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Rimini Red
tyres
I probably know the answer to this question before i ask it but will a 110 take 285/75/16 without a lift?

Thanks
Post #4593 10th Nov 2008 8:51am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Sonic3d



Member Since: 28 Jan 2008
Location: Ross on Wye
Posts: 1505

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS DCPU Stornoway Grey
Yes Thumbs Up I have BFG MT 285-75-16 on mine without a lift, and on the std boost alloys


Click image to enlarge
Post #4597 10th Nov 2008 11:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
The Boy



Member Since: 28 Aug 2008
Location: East Northants
Posts: 1459

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Rimini Red
Thanks for the reply, Thumbs Up . How do you get on with them? Any down points?
Post #4598 10th Nov 2008 11:51am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Sonic3d



Member Since: 28 Jan 2008
Location: Ross on Wye
Posts: 1505

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS DCPU Stornoway Grey
I would`nt have anything else. They are excellent on road with not too much noise, and off road even better Very Happy Don`t be tempted to buy AT`s they might be slightly quieter but no good at all in mud.
Post #4600 10th Nov 2008 12:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
The Boy



Member Since: 28 Aug 2008
Location: East Northants
Posts: 1459

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Rimini Red
Thanks Sonic

TBH I am looking at BFG AT as I don't do much mud in the 110 just tracks, some rocks and sand. I also need to travel though europe and think for me the AT's are the best compromise. I do have 255/85 BFG muds on my 90 and it does very well in the sticky stuff. Thanks again.
Post #4609 11th Nov 2008 10:45am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
dm_td5



Member Since: 20 Jul 2008
Location: Arnhem Land
Posts: 609

Australia 2008 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Zermatt Silver
In my experience BFG AT's hate rocks. They chip like crazy and the tread just falls apart at the site of a rocky out crop. BFG MT's are a whole different tyre. I had BFG AT's once on a Disco1 and would never use them again. Great on the road, quiet, good in the wet, but fell apart off-road much to quickly. 110 2.4TDCi
110 300Tdi

LROCV ::: AULRO.com
Post #4611 11th Nov 2008 11:34am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
The Boy



Member Since: 28 Aug 2008
Location: East Northants
Posts: 1459

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Rimini Red
I think DM that maybe you use yours much more than maybe I would. My Brother has had a set on his td5 for 5 yrs and apart from this year has been on evey trip we have done. To date he has had no failures nor damage but like I said it may be we don't use them as hard as you do. I have had AT's on other lr's before but never this size. Thanks for your input Thumbs Up

Boy
Post #4613 11th Nov 2008 11:49am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Laurie



Member Since: 22 Feb 2008
Location: Sussex, England
Posts: 2897

England 2005 Defender 90 Td5 XS CSW Bonatti Grey
I've split several sidewalls on BFG MTs over the years.
Range Rover Classic rears - probably more heavily loaded than a Defender.
Goodyear MTRs are my favourite but my Dakar runs superbly on Hankook Dynapro MTRs.
Post #4616 11th Nov 2008 12:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
The Boy



Member Since: 28 Aug 2008
Location: East Northants
Posts: 1459

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Rimini Red
Thanks for all the advice, wheels & tyres now fitted.



Admin note: this post has had its images recovered from a money grabbing photo hosting site and reinstated Mr. Green
Post #4837 20th Nov 2008 9:52am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Landy nut



Member Since: 22 Dec 2007
Location: In hiding
Posts: 154

United Kingdom 2006 Defender 90 Td5 PU Epsom Green
Which size did you go for in the end? They look like 285's, but the proportions look a little out for a 285.
Post #4838 20th Nov 2008 11:07am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
The Boy



Member Since: 28 Aug 2008
Location: East Northants
Posts: 1459

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Rimini Red
285/75/16 with 8.5 x 16 wheels. not had to adjust the stops either.
Post #4839 20th Nov 2008 11:12am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Landy nut



Member Since: 22 Dec 2007
Location: In hiding
Posts: 154

United Kingdom 2006 Defender 90 Td5 PU Epsom Green
Looks really good mate. A truck you can rightly be proud of. Good news about the stops too.

Just one last question - is that the heavy duty suspension you have on there or the standard set up? I have heavy duty on my double cab and am thinking of 285's (MT's though) and want to get a good idea of what it will look like.

Once again mate, a lovely truck and a nice number plate too. I have been looking for a nice number plate for my truck but cant find anything.

Best wishes

Landy nut
Post #4841 20th Nov 2008 12:26pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
The Boy



Member Since: 28 Aug 2008
Location: East Northants
Posts: 1459

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Rimini Red
Standard springs and shocks. I do want to at some time get a OME set but that will have to wait for a while.
Post #4842 20th Nov 2008 12:33pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Landy nut



Member Since: 22 Dec 2007
Location: In hiding
Posts: 154

United Kingdom 2006 Defender 90 Td5 PU Epsom Green
Well, if you are only running standard shocks and springs, you might want to consider Land Rover genuine heavy duty springs, as they lifted mine (current truck) by about 1.5" and still keep a decent ride quality and you wont have to worry about modifying anything else, like castor arms, double cardon props which some people find necessary after a lift (plus extended brake hoses). Did a lift etc on my last truck.

Shock wise, I would not honestly advise LR genuine ones as they are pretty crap ride wise. If you are not looking at spending huge amounts, I can definitely recommend DeCarbon ones as they are a good price and give a lovely ride.

LR genuine springs really are excellent though and are only about £65-70 a pair. The other nice thing about HD springs is that you dont initially have to change the shocks, so it means you are not having the huge initial outlay for a full lift, as you can get the springs first, the the shocks when you feel like it.
Post #4843 20th Nov 2008 1:00pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
markalpha



Member Since: 23 Apr 2008
Location: Downham Market
Posts: 690

England 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Santorini Black
I agree with Landy nut HD spring are a big improvement and also don't affect your warranty which is a big plus!
Post #4846 20th Nov 2008 3:53pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 3 123>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums