↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Maintenance & Modifications > Puma 2.2 Engine - replacement or rebuild.
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
JJW



Member Since: 25 Feb 2025
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 2

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Santorini Black
Puma 2.2 Engine - replacement or rebuild.
Good afternoon all,

My 110 recently broke down on the dual carriageway.
The car felt very juddery, then the revs shot up and I lost all power despite the engine still running. Looking under the bonnet, there was a lot of oil on the underside of the bonnet and covering the engine.

Initial inspections from a defender specialist seem to show that a piston failure has meant that oil has been pulled through the engine, into the turbo etc.

Now I'm faced with the decision of having the current engine rebuilt, finding a refurbished or low milage 2.2 puma engine to replace it with, or going for a different engine altogether.

Has anyone else had this issue, and what is the best route in terms of both reliability and maintaining value going forwards?

Any advice greatly appreciated!

Thanks.
Post #1061331 25th Feb 2025 2:41pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Ianh



Member Since: 17 Sep 2018
Location: Essex
Posts: 2219

United Kingdom 
As another option a new base 2.2 engine would be circa £5k inc vat , plus fitting.

Many will advocate an M57 conversation, but that can still be expensive and invariably involves getting a used engine. Some will advocate an LS3 or other V8, but that will require a lot of cash.

As for rebuilding your existing engine, it all depends on how much damage has been caused, and how much potential future failures have been enhanced due to the current identified damage. It’s all a bit of a risk as additional damage can be identified as the rebuild gets underway and before you know it you could have spent as much rebuilding your engines as you would have buying a new base engine.

As for a refurbished engine or used engine, again it’s a risk as you really don’t know their history and if they will last.

So if not going for a different engine, in your situation I would most likely go for a new 2.2 engine. I did think about a new 2.4 , as you can then get rid of the DPF, do an EGR delete, add a catch can and likely get 250k miles out of it. However that would require swapping ECUs, loom, IPAC etc etc, so costly and probably not worth it.


Ps did you have a map on your engine ?
Post #1061338 25th Feb 2025 3:30pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17670

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Apart from the complexity of the conversion, new 2.4 engines are exceptionally hard to find at the moment for some reason.

I'd either get a new 2.2, or I'd get a pre-owned 2.2 and then strip the old one with a view to rebuilding it if practicable.
Post #1061352 25th Feb 2025 4:58pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Bluest



Member Since: 23 Apr 2016
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 4251

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Java Black
I've read numerous times on here that the Puma engine doesn't rebuild well. I've no idea why that is, but it's be interesting to see if anyone has had one rebuilt and had long service out of it. 2007 110 TDCi Station Wagon XS
Post #1061355 25th Feb 2025 5:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17670

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
I am pretty sure that the problem is the people rebuilding them not the engine.

There is nothing special about the engine.
Post #1061357 25th Feb 2025 5:21pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JJW



Member Since: 25 Feb 2025
Location: Shropshire
Posts: 2

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Santorini Black
Thanks for the replies all.

[/quote]Ps did you have a map on your engine ?

No I didn't have a map on it, all completely standard. I've only owned it for a year.

I agree a new engine looks like the way to go, would one from a company like Ivor Searle be a good option? Re-manufactured but not as expensive as a new engine.


[/quote]
Post #1061360 25th Feb 2025 6:00pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Inigo



Member Since: 13 Nov 2011
Location: Kent
Posts: 625

United Kingdom 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Orkney Grey
My second engine lasted 60,000 miles, the first only 12,000. Last time I looked at the M57 option, but only secondhand engines available, all of unknown provenance.

Next time, I'll probably go for another 2.2. When it works, it suits the vehicle reasonably well. I have another car to go fast in.
Post #1061361 25th Feb 2025 6:28pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MK



Member Since: 28 Aug 2008
Location: Santiago
Posts: 2461

Chile 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Chawton White
blackwolf wrote:
Apart from the complexity of the conversion, new 2.4 engines are exceptionally hard to find at the moment for some reason.

I'd either get a new 2.2, or I'd get a pre-owned 2.2 and then strip the old one with a view to rebuilding it if practicable.


One reason could be many 2.4 engines (and 2.2s as well) are being built in China and sold somewhere where the old transit is still in use.

Anyway, 2 years ago I had to buy a new 2.2 stripped engine for a 110" and it came through Turner Engineers. Label showed this Ford engine was assembled in South Africa. Puma 110" SW

.............................................................
Earth first. Other planets later
Post #1061423 26th Feb 2025 11:47am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Chicken Drumstick



Member Since: 17 Aug 2020
Location: Near MK
Posts: 860

United Kingdom 
Re: Puma 2.2 Engine - replacement or rebuild.
JJW wrote:
Good afternoon all,

My 110 recently broke down on the dual carriageway.
The car felt very juddery, then the revs shot up and I lost all power despite the engine still running. Looking under the bonnet, there was a lot of oil on the underside of the bonnet and covering the engine.

Initial inspections from a defender specialist seem to show that a piston failure has meant that oil has been pulled through the engine, into the turbo etc.

Now I'm faced with the decision of having the current engine rebuilt, finding a refurbished or low milage 2.2 puma engine to replace it with, or going for a different engine altogether.

Has anyone else had this issue, and what is the best route in terms of both reliability and maintaining value going forwards?

Any advice greatly appreciated!

Thanks.


I would have thought a used engine would be the cheapest option as a replacement. Then probably a rebuild, but depends what kind of rebuild you go for. I suspect most of the engine is likely fine and to make it run would only need 'x' amount doing to it. But many will spend more on a rebuild replacing everything.

What are you goals/budget?

Do you want to keep the vehicle? Do you want to improve the vehicle? Or do you only want to patch it together to sell it on?


There are lots of engine options out there.

You'd need to sit down and work out prices.

The 3.2 version of the Puma engine is meant to be a fairly easy swap. I suspect this would cost only slightly more than sourcing a 2.2 engine, but give a reasonable increase in bhp & torque.

There is a company offering a Td5 conversion kit. Which might be an interesting option, Td5 engines can be had a lot cheaper, although I expect it wouldn't be cheaper all said an done when you include the conversion kit.

BMW M57, although I'd expect this to cost more than the above options, but a common swap.

Chevy LS swap, similar or more than an M57, really depends how cheap you could source an engine.


Lots and lots of other engine options.


If you don't really plan on keeping, might be worth considering selling as is too... might be cheaper/less hassle than repairing.
Post #1061429 26th Feb 2025 1:13pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums