 | Home > Off Topic > Directive 1999/44/EC |
 
|
|
|
| blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 17366   
|
This is nothing whatsoever to do with Defenders, but given that amongst Def2 members and contributors we have a vast range of experience I thought I would ask for advice.
About 18 months ago I bought a new, rather specialist (ruggedised and with thermal imaging) and fairly expensive smartphone from a UK on-line retailer. It is, I think, a small retailer, but the only supplier in the UK of that particular range of phones. The supplier has no affiliation with the manufacturer. The phone came with a 1-year manufacturer's warranty. After approx 18 months of use the phone died completely whilst on charge overnight. It is no longer possible to power the phone on, nor to access the phone remotely, nor to power it externally. It has many characteristics on Monty Python's Norwegian Blue parrot. This I found disappointing. I contacted the retailer who replied promptly and with some sympathy and said (1) you need to take it up with the manufacturer (who remember has no UK presence), (2) as the supplier we cannot help, (3) we have always found the supplier useless and unhelpful (wish they'd told me this before I bought the phone!) and (4) your best bet is to take it to a high-street repairer. This I found even more disappointing. I then contacted the manufacturer (I think USA-based although the phone is made in the far east) who after some "to-ing and fro-ing" said that they were "not allowed" to help me since I hadn't bought the phone directly from them. This I found extremely disappointing. A colleague at work then put me on to Directive 1999/44/EC which put a legal requirement on suppliers of consumer equipment within the EC to proved a 2-year warranty to the extent that they had to repair or replace any consumer equipment which failed within two years. This directive was passed into UK law when we were in the EU, and has been retained so is still UK law. I didn't know about this beforehand and suspect that most people, including the supplier of my phone, don't know about it either. Naturally I emailed the supplier suggesting that he familiarise himself with this directive and then contact me to discuss how he is going to fulfil his legal obligation regarding my phone, and - perhaps unsurprisingly - I not only heard nothing from him but have also found that he has become very hard to contact! So my question is this: has anyone here had any experience in getting a supplier to repair or replace faulty good by virtue of this or any other directive, and does anyone have any useful advice how I can go about it? I would prefer not to have to engage legal professionals since I imagine it would not be cost effective, but I am still keen to do something. Any suggestions would be welcome, and remember if you are in a similar predicament you might want to have a read of https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN...31999L0044 |
||
15th May 2024 10:24am |
|
| blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 17366
|
Indeed, I am largely resolved to be disappointed by this (and have already replaced the phone with something from a much more "mainstream" manufacturer together with a standalone thermal imaging camera) but as a matter of principle I feel that if the law says I have a two year repair or replace warranty from the retailer then I should at the very least nag the retailer for a while. He shouldn't just be allowed to get away with ignoring the law, even if, as I suspect, he didn't know about it beforehand.
It has made be realise though that Landrover is not the only firm whose interest in the customer ends at the moment the sale is concluded! 
I would be interested to know if any one else here has managed to achieve any kind of result by means of EC Directive 1999/44. |
||
|
15th May 2024 2:19pm |
|
| AMBxx Member Since: 24 Jul 2016 Location: York Posts: 1031 
|
It was my understanding that the 2 years isn't a fixed term. It's more along the lines of how long a reasonable person would expect that item to last. Hence, the rule of thumb being 2 years.
The retailer isn't responsible for the whole 2 years. I'm not sure it's there problem for much more than 6 months or so. It all falls to the manufacturer which is where you've hit a block. Not sure what to suggest other than to buy a new phone. |
||
|
15th May 2024 3:15pm |
|
| Dinnu Member Since: 24 Dec 2019 Location: Lija Posts: 3414  
|
No consumer affair authority to provide service? 1988 90 Hard Top, 19J Diesel Turbo, Shire Blue - Restoration ongoing
2012 90 CSW, 2.2TDCI, Santorini Black |
||
|
15th May 2024 4:02pm |
|
| trevorg Member Since: 28 May 2022 Location: Aisne Posts: 51  
|
Take them to the small claims court for your money back plus interest (if applicable). A cost effective way of reaching a settlement and perhaps once you advise them of your intentions they may concede.
https://www.gov.uk/make-court-claim-for-money 2012 90SW - 2.2TDCI |
||
|
15th May 2024 4:38pm |
|
| Bowbearer Member Since: 12 Aug 2022 Location: Norfolk Posts: 170 
|
Try the Citizen's Advice, they have lots of standard letters written by Solicitors.
Send them one of those, they are very official and say all the right things to get a response. I don't like how manufacturers build in a limited life on products, this is what this law was brought in to tackle. under the same law an amendment was added that they have to provide spares so that stuff can be fixed and not scrapped. Keep fighting. |
||
|
16th May 2024 9:00am |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
