DEFENDER2.NET - View topic - MPG td5 v 2.2tdci

↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In

Home > Maintenance & Modifications > MPG td5 v 2.2tdci

Page 1 of 1

Print this entire topic ·

roche1800

Member Since: 07 Apr 2020
Location: derbyshire
Posts: 334

MPG td5 v 2.2tdci

Does anyone know the real mpg of a 5 speed td5 v a 6 speed 2.2tdci please

14th Jan 2024 11:23am

Dinnu

Member Since: 24 Dec 2019
Location: Lija
Posts: 3428

2012 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Santorini Black

2.2 slightly thirstier. Comparing urban driving only. No motorways.
Comparing almost like with like, both 90s SW. Td5 on mud terrains, 2.2 on ATs. 1988 90 Hard Top, 19J Diesel Turbo, Shire Blue - Restoration ongoing
2012 90 CSW, 2.2TDCI, Santorini Black

14th Jan 2024 11:33am

Chicken Drumstick

Member Since: 17 Aug 2020
Location: Near MK
Posts: 754

I would think both very similar. Official figures may not be comparable, due to differing standards.

I’d guess the TD5 has the potential to be more thirsty and more frugal, depending on how it’s driven or if modded.

Eg

Two stock Disco 2’s manuals. But different model years. One would never do better than 26-28mpg the other would do 33mpg+ but never felt as pokey.

On a laning trip last year the Td5 in the group had worse mpg compared to the 2.2 Puma in the group. But it had slightly more aggressive tyres, roof rack and modded to 190hp. The 2.2 was factory standard including the tyres. But did have a larger intercooler.

Overall I’d suggest the 2 engines are likely always going to be 1-3mpg within each other. Certainly close enough for it to be a non issue.

14th Jan 2024 11:51am

The Zee

Member Since: 26 May 2019
Location: Salisbury
Posts: 289

2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Indus Silver

Ave. MPG from my 2.2 tdci is between 27-32 mpg. Standard unmodded 2.2 with DPF & EGR, 110 Utlity with no mods (sound proofing or other heavy bits), standard Boost with Coni. CrossContact OEM size tyre.

I would think the MPG from a 2.4 or td5 would be better; there is no DPF regen cycle, which burns excess diesel to perforn a regen. So less ecomony is better for the environment? Zaid-M
www.DefencePhotos.com
2014 Defender 110 Utility, 2.2 Puma, Indus Silver
Not just transport more like a religion

14th Jan 2024 1:32pm

barbel jim

Member Since: 12 Dec 2012
Location: Northants
Posts: 1423

Get better mpg from my td5 and a lot more smiles

I was lucky to get 24 mpg from my 2.2.owned from new 2 years and 40k miles. I used fueley for the duration of ownership.
1st was a waste of time. The engine didn’t like to Rev like a td5, you short shift , and spend a lot of time with your foot planted on the floor. I had the stage 2 map supposedly the daddies, and the wife drove past me in the Td5

Average 28-36 in my Td5

14th Jan 2024 6:26pm

Dover mike

Member Since: 01 Aug 2023
Location: Dover kent
Posts: 14

i have a TD5 10p with twisted performance tune, big intercooler 3 1/2 inch S/S full exhaust, 275/85-19 A/T, H/D props, H/D 1/2 shafts and a disco transfer box, fully carpeted and sound proofing and doing 600 miles a week every week and getting 350 mile a tank full

15th Jan 2024 11:22am

camelman

Member Since: 27 Feb 2013
Location: Peak District
Posts: 3373

Had a handful of 2.2s and never really got more than 24mpg.
My 130 TD5 returns 25mpg average and 27-30 on a run.

15th Jan 2024 12:05pm

Page 1 of 1

All times are GMT

Jump to

< Previous Topic | Next Topic >

Posting Rules

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum