↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > Emissions Test Failed on Dutch MOT equivalent - HELP
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 5 of 8 <12345678>
Print this entire topic · 
Dinnu



Member Since: 24 Dec 2019
Location: Lija
Posts: 3414

Malta 2012 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Santorini Black
There was recently a post with a link to some nice, delivery milage (IIRC) ROW spec Defenders, which adverts clearly stated cannot be registered in the UK… and actually rest of Europe as a matter of fact. 1988 90 Hard Top, 19J Diesel Turbo, Shire Blue - Restoration ongoing
2012 90 CSW, 2.2TDCI, Santorini Black
Post #992372 12th May 2023 11:05am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Ianh



Member Since: 17 Sep 2018
Location: Essex
Posts: 1997

United Kingdom 
It’s been an interesting read.
What has been established is the vehicle, for whatever reason, is equipped with a ROW cat , not an EU /UK spec DPF.

This raises several questions.

Is the vehicle operating within the ROW emissions specifications? Checking out the Australian forums such as AULRO may provide insight. If not and the fault is identified and rectified would that still meet the Netherlands emissions spec.

Are you able to register and drive a ROW spec 2.2 puma on public roads in the EU ? I think the answer is no

Can you covert a ROW spec 2.2 puma to meet EU emission regulations? I expect you can. Will require DPF downpipe, dpf differential pressure sensor plus pipes and wiring , remap of ECU to cater for the DPF, I.e EU map. All will cost a fair bit, but hardware may be available as used items.

If you do convert to DPF, will that raise any issues with authorities, or will they not notice if your vehicle passes emissions tests? Given you have been driving it to date and no issues with authorities has come up then as long as it passes tests with new DPF etc fitted I doubt it will be a problem.
Post #992387 12th May 2023 12:40pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
BaCoNMX6



Member Since: 22 Apr 2022
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 63

Netherlands 
Quite honestly I don't think the conclusion is that my vehicle has somehow appeared in Europe and slipped through the cracks.

Having run a CarVeritcal check in the past it was clearly registered in NL original back in late 2014 (so presumably initial registration) and then the history disappears for a bit when I believe it was taken to germany until 2021 when it was brought back to NL when I bought it from a dealer.

It has also been to 2 different official Land Rover dealers in my ownership - once in NL and once in France and did not raise any issues or red flags.

Further given there is clearly a CAT only Downpipe available for the 2.2 which also references the EU4 categorisation (along with a DPF+CAT downpipe which refers to EU5) it also points to the fact that at some stage they were delivered in Europe with a Cat only downpipe for whatever reason.

Why does it seem to be a 'ROW' vehicle? I dont yet know however my next investigation is to take a look at other VIN's for the PUMA in NL and Germany (assuming I can find some online) and see if perhaps there was a time when the ROW spec was being delivered for whatever reason!
Post #992390 12th May 2023 1:12pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Julie



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 479

France 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
trevorg wrote:
Well, not wanting to brag, my 2012 passed it’s pollution check today. From the certificate the requirement here was for an opacity of <0.5 mine recorded 0.1. Happy days!


Mine is always at 0.0 - PM not mesurable.

And I can also test it at 0.8 (le process verbal était quand même favorable puisque le contrôleur à changé son profil en 2,4 litre...)

And after some days of trial the tail pipe is as black as on a ROW Defender

With that DPF you can easily influence any pollution test.
Post #992424 12th May 2023 7:17pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Julie



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 479

France 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
BaCoNMX6 wrote:
Quite honestly I don't think the conclusion is that my vehicle has somehow appeared in Europe and slipped through the cracks.


This isn't strange at all. If you move to a EU country you are allowed to register your private car - even if it is not conform to European standards.

AFAIK the last EURO2 Defenders have been MY2013
MY2014 is EURO4 or EURO5
For any Defender with a VIN starting on SAL...

If you move outside the EU you can change the spec of your car.
And if you move back you keep its downgraded emission standard.
In this case we're talking about legal conversions.
And you're allowed to sell that car inside EU

Just look for the pressure sensor in order to distinguish EURO5 (with the sensor) from EURO4
Or have a JLR retailer do that job.

Normally, the car's documents should confirm the EURO4 soec, too.
If not, they should be remade.

And in this case, the test has to be remade for the correct EURO4 spec i.e. for a pre 2011 car.
Post #992426 12th May 2023 7:40pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Julie



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 479

France 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green
BaCoNMX6 wrote:
Further given there is clearly a CAT only Downpipe available for the 2.2 which also references the EU4 categorisation (along with a DPF+CAT downpipe which refers to EU5) it also points to the fact that at some stage they were delivered in Europe with a Cat only downpipe for whatever reason.

Why does it seem to be a 'ROW' vehicle? I dont yet know however my next investigation is to take a look at other VIN's for the PUMA in NL and Germany (assuming I can find some online) and see if perhaps there was a time when the ROW spec was being delivered for whatever reason!


The 2.2 CAT only downpipe is for non-EU countries. Inside EU all 2.2 have been EURO5
(exception : EURO4 military cars)

Forget about ROW. The TD5 Defenders (pre2007) have been according to European standards (while ROW Defenders kept the TDI engine).

A MY2014 Defender is EURO4 or EURO5 - if conform - or illegally blanked...
Post #992431 12th May 2023 8:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
BaCoNMX6



Member Since: 22 Apr 2022
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 63

Netherlands 
Current status is waiting on the dealer I purchased from to provide some additional information on the background of the vehicle to help uncover how/what/why/when.

In the meantime I have had a 'passive' DPF section made up to replace the centre silencer and thus easily passed the emissions test (result down to 5k PPM! instead of over 4million!) - not ideal as it will requiring regular (?) removal and manual cleaning however a damn sight cheaper than a genuine LR one plus all the additional parts needed to even plug it in potentially. Even an annual clean at 300 Euros means its only more expensive after 10+ years....(assuming an annual cleaning is enough)
Post #992728 15th May 2023 3:12pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
TexasRover



Member Since: 24 Nov 2022
Location: Paris
Posts: 1042

France 2002 Defender 110 Td5 DCPU Chawton White
A friend of a friend suggested you fit your DPF for your APK.
Post #992748 15th May 2023 5:08pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
BaCoNMX6



Member Since: 22 Apr 2022
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 63

Netherlands 
Hey TexasRover

In essence that's what I have had to do however since the car didn't have it from factory from what we seem to have deduced in this thread it meant fitting an 'additional' one elsewhere in the exhaust at least for the time being until I figure out the full chain of events/history up to my ownership!
Post #992766 15th May 2023 6:22pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Will@LRW



Member Since: 04 May 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 178

 1997 Defender 110 300 Tdi CSW Alpine White
Your VIN has a "Russia" marker next to it meaning it was intended for that market - it doesn't mean it actually went there (or that it helps your issue particularly), but it's another clue in the puzzle. Most of the SALLDHMR8FA vehicles were for the Russian market, followed by the general "ROW" market and then places like the UAE, Brazil and Kuwait.

I had someone contact me earlier this year to help clarify the exact same thing - they had bought a Russian vehicle sold as a German EU5 spec, which was causing similar problems.

If you go the way of fitting a factory DPF, I believe the ECU map is different also on EU5 engines.

Good luck! LR Workshop
Find a Defender's history and spec: https://defender.lrworkshop.com
Post #992774 15th May 2023 7:23pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
BaCoNMX6



Member Since: 22 Apr 2022
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 63

Netherlands 
Interesting! Is there anything else to look for if that is the case?

Yeh retrofitting the full factory dpf system seems like it would be alot of money and likely problems along with that! Hence why I went with my solution for now!
Post #992784 15th May 2023 8:22pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
hornet



Member Since: 04 Jan 2010
Location: Western Europe
Posts: 361

Regardless of the fact that a full explanation would be interesting, I would simply remove this "temporary" DPF after the emissions test, then it won't get dirty and the car will thank you for it too. Exhaust back pressure is bad.
Post #992816 16th May 2023 7:56am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Dinnu



Member Since: 24 Dec 2019
Location: Lija
Posts: 3414

Malta 2012 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Santorini Black
^^^ I think I would do the same... you are not breaking the law, as the vehicle was registered as it is (was). 1988 90 Hard Top, 19J Diesel Turbo, Shire Blue - Restoration ongoing
2012 90 CSW, 2.2TDCI, Santorini Black
Post #992827 16th May 2023 10:23am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
BaCoNMX6



Member Since: 22 Apr 2022
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 63

Netherlands 
I do tend to agree however for the time being I will leave it alone as I want to get a few v-bands installed on the various exhaust sections anyway to make for easier swapping if needed.
Post #992839 16th May 2023 11:57am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17364

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
Dinnu wrote:
... you are not breaking the law, as the vehicle was registered as it is (was).


I would think that this is an optimistic view. If the vehicle is required to pass the tests which are the subject of this thread, then regardless of its state at time of registration I suspect that it would be unlawful to remove equipment needed to allow it to pass the test.

I don't know how rigorous the enforcement regime is in the Netherlands but I would have thought that it was likely that you would not be found out if you did remove it though.

It would be interesting to know if an error was made at the time of registration or if this is some strange effect of poorly-thought-out retroactive legislation. I suspect it is only a matter of time before it happens in the UK.
Post #992852 16th May 2023 1:24pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 5 of 8 <12345678>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums