↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > General & Technical (L663) > Euro NCAP Crash & Safety Tests
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
vlad



Member Since: 11 Oct 2020
Location: RO
Posts: 67

Romania 
Euro NCAP Crash & Safety Tests
Post #872085 9th Dec 2020 9:02am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
DSL



Member Since: 20 Aug 2007
Location: Wandering the wasteland.
Posts: 837

United Kingdom 
SWMBO thought this look was quite good!! Shocked Shocked


Click image to enlarge


Loved the waving wipers in the front collisions. Laughing
Post #872088 9th Dec 2020 9:25am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
markb110



Member Since: 22 May 2010
Location: Guildford
Posts: 2636

England 2002 Defender 90 Td5 HT Epsom Green
The head bouncing off the bonnet reminded me of that scene from the film Dog Soldiers.......so good to know all is well if you run into a pack of werewolves....... Whistle
Post #872115 9th Dec 2020 11:30am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
The reverse angle:


Click image to enlarge


It looks impressive but curious to see that "The Land Rover Defender received a maximum five-star Euro NCAP rating - but the Land Rover Defender and Isuzu D-Max lose points in ‘compatibility’ test....."

Thatcham Research - new Euro NCAP test protocols identify vehicles that must offer improved protection for other vehicles

http://www.abpclub.co.uk/bodyshop-news.php?id=156827

" new Land Rover Defender and Isuzu D-Max deemed too aggressive in the head-on collision test."

"The latest Euro NCAP test results highlight the important challenge some manufacturers face when their vehicles are exposed to the most exacting protocols so far, with the new Land Rover Defender and Isuzu D-Max deemed too aggressive in the head-on collision test.

Impact testing methods were overhauled for 2020, with the head-on collision now consisting of two moving elements: the test vehicle itself and a Mobile Progressive Deformable Barrier (MPDB).

This test not only looks at intrusion on the test vehicle but also to the MPDB which represents the partner vehicle in a collision. To avoid being penalised within the latest test protocols, large vehicles must now offer more protection – and better compatibility – to smaller vehicles during a collision.

Although they both achieved a maximum five-star Euro NCAP rating, the Defender and D-Max lost points for their performance during the MPDB test and the threat they pose to partner vehicles in a collision.

The D-Max, which scored 11.2 out of 16 in the frontal impact test and 84% for overall adult occupant protection, caused some ‘localised areas of high deformation’ to the MPDB, while the Defender’s ‘high mass and front structure makes it an aggressive partner to a colliding vehicle’. It scored 11.7 out of 16 and 85% for adult occupant protection.

“The new-for-2020 tests are really driving a requirement for increased performance and more aggressive cars like the Defender and D-Max are being identified and marked down as a result,” Matthew Avery, Thatcham Research’s Director of Research, explained. “The latest test results show some manufacturers are finding compatibility a challenge.”

https://www.mynewsdesk.com/uk/thatcham-res...es-3057496

Worth a full read:

Click image to enlarge


https://www.mynewsdesk.com/uk/thatcham-res...eet-101941

This came as a bit of a surprise:

"Land Rover state that a child restraint should not be installed in the optional front row 'jump seat'." A bit of a catch 22 then, seat is only big enough for a child, but it's only suitable for an adult?
Post #872128 9th Dec 2020 1:22pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
umbertob



Member Since: 21 Jun 2020
Location: Altadena, CA
Posts: 133

United States 
Not to sound selfish..., but I could give exactly two sh*ts about compatibility tests and what happens to other cars, as long as my Defender keeps me and my family safe in a major crash like those simulated ones. What can I say, other lesser manufacturers of crappy econoboxes and SUVs better step it up and keep up with Land Rover. Twisted Evil

Regarding the front jumper seat, there are plenty of children aged somewhere between 10 and 15 that would fit just fine there, with no need for booster seats. Also, my wife. Wink 2020 NAS Defender 110 HSE 5-seater / Silver / Khaki / Black Pack / Black Roof / Satin Film / Cold Pack / Off-Road Pack / Advanced OR Pack / Comfort + Convenience Pack / Sirius + HD radio / HUD / Meridian Surround
Post #872141 9th Dec 2020 3:57pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
DSL



Member Since: 20 Aug 2007
Location: Wandering the wasteland.
Posts: 837

United Kingdom 
Begs the question, are you brave enough to suggest Mrs umbertob sits there? Whistle Whistle
Post #872144 9th Dec 2020 4:06pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Defendit..



Member Since: 09 Aug 2020
Location: 's-Hertogenbosch
Posts: 422

Netherlands 
Pretty impresive !, I'am gonna be safe in this car. Very rigid, no deformation of the cabin.
Post #872154 9th Dec 2020 4:41pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Philip



Member Since: 09 Mar 2018
Location: England
Posts: 510

United Kingdom 
The anti-SUV agenda gains traction. Seems fashions might be changing anyway - apparently young Rolls Royce customers are shunning the Cullinan in favour of the Ghost because SUVs are cars for “their dad” (and not because it’s completely hideous).
Post #872158 9th Dec 2020 4:57pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
umbertob wrote:
Not to sound selfish..., but I could give exactly two sh*ts about compatibility tests

I think things are a little different on your side of the pond ~ isn't the Defender the minnow when it comes to full size 4x4s and pickups.

umbertob wrote:
Regarding the front jumper seat, there are plenty of children aged somewhere between 10 and 15 that would fit just fine there, with no need for booster seats. Also, my wife. Wink


Quite but have you seen it mentioned in any of the marketing literature?
Post #872165 9th Dec 2020 5:19pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Philip wrote:
The anti-SUV agenda gains traction.


Quite. The language used makes it clear which way the wind is blowing at Euro NCAP.
Post #872167 9th Dec 2020 5:23pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Cheshire110



Member Since: 26 Jul 2013
Location: Cheshire/London
Posts: 2755

United Kingdom 
All very impressive!

Anyone who remembers 5th gear crashing the Discovery 1 will see how far cars have come in recent decades Cheers, David
Land Rovers of all shapes S3 onwards… Daily is a 110 V8.
Post #872168 9th Dec 2020 5:29pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Philip



Member Since: 09 Mar 2018
Location: England
Posts: 510

United Kingdom 
Supacat wrote:


Quite but have you seen it mentioned in any of the marketing literature?


Doesn’t have ISOFIX or i-Size fittings, but I wonder if it might be a dimensions thing (some cars’ centre rear seats aren’t listed as suitable either) - the seat and seatbelt obviously work to restrain the mass of an adult.
Post #872170 9th Dec 2020 5:41pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Tim in Scotland



Member Since: 23 May 2007
Location: The Land that time forgot
Posts: 3753

 

Click image to enlarge
 Pangea Green D250 90 HSE with Air Suspension, Off-road Pack, Towing Pack, Black Contrast roof , rear recovery eyes, Front bash plate, Classic flaps all round, extended wheel arch kit and a few bits from PowerfulUK Expel Clear Gloss PPF to come
2020 D240 1st Edition in Pangea Green with Acorn interior. Now gone - old faithful, no mechanical issues whatsoever ever but the leaks and rattles all over the place won’t be missed!
Post #872177 9th Dec 2020 6:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Philip



Member Since: 09 Mar 2018
Location: England
Posts: 510

United Kingdom 
Crash performance another reason why solid front axles are no longer used.
Post #872181 9th Dec 2020 6:11pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
DSL



Member Since: 20 Aug 2007
Location: Wandering the wasteland.
Posts: 837

United Kingdom 
Re pic Snigger
Post #872182 9th Dec 2020 6:11pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums