 | Home > INEOS Grenadier > Ineos “children’s” colouring in competition rules..... |
 
|
|
|
| Zed Member Since: 07 Oct 2017 Location: In the woods Posts: 3265   
|
Jim is on a roll at the moment. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2020/d...nimum-wage
His French workers won't put up with that  behaviour. WARNING.
This post may contain sarcasm. |
||
31st Dec 2020 3:11pm |
|
| markb110 Member Since: 22 May 2010 Location: Guildford Posts: 2627  
|
The rich don't get rich by giving it away......
 |
||
|
31st Dec 2020 4:00pm |
|
| discomog Member Since: 09 May 2015 Location: Notts/Lincs Border Posts: 2526 
|
I for one will not be entering the competition so the rest of you will stand a better chance. (I'm afraid graphic design is not my forte anyway). Defender 90XS SW
Mini Countryman Cooper S Morgan Plus 8 |
||
|
31st Dec 2020 4:39pm |
|
| zilch Member Since: 11 Sep 2019 Location: Whitsundays & Sydney Posts: 816 
|
and may save on some hefty legal/lawyer fees further down the track as well if you were have deemed to infringe some corporate design/IP  yet another pommie bar steward down under
MY20 110 P400 SE Defender MY10 3.0 RR Sport |
||
|
3rd Jan 2021 11:51pm |
|
| Philip Member Since: 09 Mar 2018 Location: England Posts: 510
|
I assume this is to cover their backs when the average seven year old designs something far more appealing.
|
||
|
4th Jan 2021 12:48pm |
|
| J77 Member Since: 04 Nov 2019 Location: Fife Posts: 3391 
|
So who’s up for taking one for the team?
White roof, green or blue paint work and white steels and we’ll call it, I don’t know, maybe, the County? 24MY 90 D250 HSE, Tasman Blue |
||
|
4th Jan 2021 7:22pm |
|
| What puddle? Member Since: 25 Oct 2013 Location: Reading Posts: 952
|
Couldn't agree more, Philip. I'm amazed that Ineos thought this was a good design. It was...for 1980. Now left. |
||
|
20th Jan 2021 12:27pm |
|
| landiepete Member Since: 31 Aug 2020 Location: Norf Posts: 18 
|
It's 'vintage' Ineos. I did a short stint with their Chemicals division. I call them the 'Ryanair of the petrochemical industry'. They make their money with fine print in contracts, deferred maintenance, circumventing regs, and charging supplemental services. The plants I workt for were bought from larger outfits where they were no longer profitable because of changed safety rules, labour laws, internal guidelines etc. For Ineos they were, because they did not have to innovate, not in producs, not in processes, not in operational methods. They just find loopholes in regs, negotiate 'clever' financial constructions, split the organization so it doesn't require union pesence, that sort of stuff. And tell their contractors they have to work cheaper or get dumped. They don't do the loyalty thing. You can call this 'business' all you like, but it's very tiring way to do business. You can't take their word for anything, there's always an angle. It makes some people very rich though. And even gets them peerages, looks like. Pete |
||
|
21st Jan 2021 9:54am |
|
| DSC-off Member Since: 16 Oct 2014 Location: North East Posts: 1400 
|
^
This sounds an accurate and considered opinion to me. Ineos grew very big in a short time by taking over businesses that other companies built up. With no experience of the Petro-chemical industry, I hadn't thought about it before. Maybe the same was planned for the Defender. JLR didn't want to build the old vehicle anymore, so was it seen as an easy 'take over' that never happened? Daimler wanted to close the Smart plant... So it was an easy take over. |
||
|
21st Jan 2021 6:46pm |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
