DEFENDER2.NET - View topic - LOF MT82 Upgraded Adapter Shaft

↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home · FAQ · New Posts · My Posts · PMs · Search · Members · Map · Calendar · Profile · Donate · Register · Log In

Home > Puma (Tdci) > LOF MT82 Upgraded Adapter Shaft

Page 1 of 2

Print this entire topic ·

Bluest

Member Since: 23 Apr 2016
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 4216

2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Java Black

LOF MT82 Upgraded Adapter Shaft

Just seen this on social media. A different approach to the Ashcroft one.

https://www.facebook.com/159278601428637/posts/511968112826349/

https://www.instagram.com/p/B-J-TutJzw-/?igshid=renk4g6tawtr 2007 110 TDCi Station Wagon XS

25th Mar 2020 12:30pm

blackwolf

Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17443

2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey

Interesting.

If, as has been surmised here on several occasions, a main part of the problem is misalignment between the MT82 mainshaft and the LT23 input shaft, I would think that all that that would achieve is that the splines on the end of the mainshaft fail.

It also would appear not to be secured to the back of the mainshaft, so I don't on the face of it see what inhibits axial movement.

On the plus side, I see that it has a lifetime warranty. Provided that also covers destruction of the mainshaft by the adaptor, the warranty could be the winner.

It will be very interesting to see some long term reviews in due course.

25th Mar 2020 12:47pm

Naks

Member Since: 27 Jan 2009
Location: Stellenbosch, ZA
Posts: 2645

2010 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 SW Alpine White

Also saw that just now, looks very promising? --
2010 Defender Puma 90 + BAS remap + Alive IC + Slickshift + Ashcroft ATB rear
2015 Range Rover Sport V8 Supercharged

Defender Puma Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zZ1en9
Discovery 4 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zXrtKO
Range Rover/Sport L320/L322/L494 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zc58JQ

25th Mar 2020 1:21pm

natyeo

Member Since: 27 Jan 2013
Location: Bentham
Posts: 136

2014 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Santorini Black

It looks sort of ok , having had one land rover that had 3 under warranty and 2 versions of the Ashcroft over 108,000 miles, will LOF be able to test it for long enough to give piece of mind
My current works motor is on its original at 117,000 miles , but feel either a slave cylinder or clutch will force me to replace 2014 2.2 90 hard top , Warm M8000 , Scorpain winch bumper, Ashcroft rear atb
2012 2.2 tdci 110 Utility
1993 110 CSW Warn M8000 , Scorpain winch bumper , 2" lift , Roamerdive overdrive, on going
1971 Hybird 200tdi, 2 x truetracs,Extrem winch bumper, M8000, GKN overdrive & Coils 2" lift, Glynn Lewis cranked rear trail arms
1971 Series 3 88, Perkins 4203,M8000,SATs,O/D,

26th Mar 2020 10:36pm

topless_matt

Member Since: 29 Mar 2015
Location: norfolk
Posts: 68

2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Tonga Green

Think I will stick with my Ashcroft kit in mine.
On the subject of lifetime warranty, once it fails it has come to the end of its life surely

Hold my beer and watch this!

26th Mar 2020 10:49pm

Roy5695

Member Since: 15 Feb 2014
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 1123

2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Indus Silver

natyeo wrote:
It looks sort of ok , having had one land rover that had 3 under warranty and 2 versions of the Ashcroft over 108,000 miles, will LOF be able to test it for long enough to give piece of mind
My current works motor is on its original at 117,000 miles , but feel either a slave cylinder or clutch will force me to replace

It’s being tested in his DefStang which is running considerably more power and torque than any 2.4/2.2 can deliver. If the quality is anything like the rest of his products I have no doubts in its longevity. 2011 Defender DCPU 2.2 - https://www.defender2.net/forum/topic30623.html

Instagram - @r22oyp

Roy

26th Mar 2020 11:30pm

Welshsurferdude

Member Since: 23 Feb 2012
Location: Newport
Posts: 2413

I have his original Ultraspec kevlar clutch from when LOF was working with Shabs at Syncro Gearboxes and I would guesstimate I've done 50k+ hard miles on it so far and its still a perfect bite featherlight clutch pedal

so going by his quality Id buy it if I had to replace my shaft which is a well lubed modified LR one fitted 75k miles ago. 2008 Santorini Black 110 XS USW (Sold)

2015 Discovery 4.5 Black pack Firenze red XS

2008 Corris Grey 110 XS USW (sold)

2011 Santorini Black 110 XS USW (Sold)

27th Mar 2020 3:55pm

Devon-Rover

Member Since: 22 Jan 2015
Location: South Devon
Posts: 917

2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Aintree Green

It's gone on sale if you are interested. I've Just gotta find time to fit it.

Also can be found on Fb, Ytube, Insta & Twitter @4WDSouthwest

3rd Sep 2020 7:01pm

Yannis

Member Since: 02 Feb 2015
Location: Oxfordshire / Milan
Posts: 408

2015 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Corris Grey

I asked some questions regarding the new Upgrade Adapter Shaft.

Here is the info directly from LOF;

It will not damage the main shaft as it’s a driven fit onto the splines, it then torques down with the draw bolt.

The end of the shaft is also ground so it seats perfectly flush against the inner race of the gearbox support bearing.

As for an alignment issue, the casings are all dowelled and machined so the adapter casing is true to the transfer box (providing no one has take dowels out)

Hope that clears up some questions.

5th Sep 2020 3:22pm

blackwolf

Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17443

That is very interesting. Clearly it has a centre bolt down the middle, which is unexpected, but I don't share LOF's confidence in the alignment of the extension and transfer box. It certainly should be true, but if it was it is unlikely that there would be so much variability in the life of the LR parts.

There is a picture showing the centre bolt plus some other parts I can't identify on their "instagram" page:-

https://www.instagram.com/p/CEoeQFlsk3K/

5th Sep 2020 5:27pm

ozzie1989

Member Since: 25 Feb 2009
Location: Wales
Posts: 282

2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Bonatti Grey

Interesting indeed! It certainly looks the part...

I'd try one but having just fitted the latest genuine LR one and only doing 6k a year I wouldn't be much help

Now: 2010 2.4 TDCi 110 Utility Wagon
Then: 2004 2.5 TD5 90 Hard Top (X-Tech Edition)

6th Sep 2020 8:17am

Pardeep

Member Since: 12 Jan 2016
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 70

I’ve just bought one from LOF along with a clutch and other bits and bobs. I should get it fitted in a couple of weeks and will report back as to how it looks and feels.

6th Sep 2020 8:32am

Julie

Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: Nantes
Posts: 497

2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 SW Keswick Green

blackwolf wrote:
.. but I don't share LOF's confidence in the alignment of the extension and transfer box. It certainly should be true, but if it was it is unlikely that there would be so much variability in the life of the LR parts.

As for now, not one single Ashcroft shaft failed. Correct me if I'm wrong.
They've been selling them for 5 yrs

If the misalignement theory was correct, we should have been reported at least one failed Ashcroft shaft ...

7th Sep 2020 8:56pm

blackwolf

Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17443

^^ I've certainly not heard of any failure of the Ashcroft part (although that doesn't mean there haven't been any but does suggest that at worst they are very infrequent), but I don't accept that that rules out alignment.

The immediate cause of the standard ones failing is fretting of the splined coupling, which indicates relative movement of the parts. The only two obvious causes of fretting are (a) that the coupling is not properly assembled (not fully engaged) and there are many photos of failed one where clearly the male part has not been fully engaged in the female part, and the spring ring has not held them together, or (b) that the the gearbox and transfer box are not correctly aligned, so that every revolution of the intermediate shaft results in some movement and hence wear of the splines. Both of these cases but especially the second are likely to be improved by decent lubrication, so it is entirely possible, I believe, that with an Ashcroft shaft there can be some misalignment but still a healthy life expectancy of the coupling.

If there is no misalignment, how would you explain the fact that you can have two identical vehicles off the line, assembled from identical parts in an identical manner, with an identical lack of any lubrication, yet one coupling fails at under 30k miles and the other fails at over 250k miles? There must be some other factor at play, and my preferred theory, at least until replaced by a better one, is that there is an accumulation of engineering tolerances through the extension housing that can, at the "wrong" extreme, misalign the coupling sufficiently to cause greatly accelerated wear.

7th Sep 2020 10:19pm

Grenadier

Member Since: 23 Jul 2014
Location: The foot of Mont Blanc...
Posts: 5829

2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Corris Grey

Please accept that my knowledge of these things, and these specific parts, is limited. But if the MT-82 mounting surface and the transmission box mounting surface are true, are unadulterated, are as per made in their respective factories, and if no shim or spacer has been added during fitting, how can the gearbox and transmission box be out of alignment? One assumes (here’s my gap in knowledge) that both will have been made with flat faces, 90 degrees to their overall shape/design, for flush fitting? If this is the case, where/how does the misalignment come from? I understand that Defender parts (indeed LR parts) may not be made with the tolerances demanded by NASA. Monsieur Le Grenadier

I've not been everywhere, but it's on my list.....

2011 Puma 110DC - Corris Grey

8th Sep 2020 6:18am

Page 1 of 2

All times are GMT

Jump to

< Previous Topic | Next Topic >

Posting Rules

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum