↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Off Topic > Evoque Recall ~ indicated fuel level may be inaccurate
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Evoque Recall ~ indicated fuel level may be inaccurate
Seems a strange one:

Alert number: A12/0594/19
Category: Motor vehicles

Product: Passenger car

Brand: Jaguar Land Rover

Name: Evoque

Type / number of model: Type-approval number: E5*2007/46*0076

Batch number / Barcode: The affected vehicles were manufactured between 05 October 2018 and 05 March 2019.

Risk type: Injuries

The indicated fuel level may be inaccurate. This could cause the vehicle to run out of fuel without any low fuel warning.
This may cause the engine to cut out while in motion, leading to an accident.

Measures taken by economic operators: Recall of the product from end users (By: Manufacturer)

https://ec.europa.eu/consumers/consumers_s...amp;lng=en
Post #768297 12th Apr 2019 4:04pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JeremyJ



Member Since: 16 Nov 2011
Location: Aylesbury
Posts: 1758

United Kingdom 
Not really that strange, fuel gauge over read. Had it on one of ours, was an early build now sorted.
Post #768315 12th Apr 2019 6:13pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
lohr500



Member Since: 14 Sep 2014
Location: Skipton
Posts: 1317

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Santorini Black
So an engine cut out caused by a lack of fuel justifies a recall due to the accident risk, but a failing Defender intermediate shaft does not. Figure that out!!
I would have thought the former would give more warning signs before failure than the latter and hence be a lower safety risk.
Post #768320 12th Apr 2019 6:45pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Interesting to see it being the top rated vehicle for depreciation:

1. Land Rover Range Rover Evoque P250 R-Dynamic
Price £38,675 Target Price £38,675
30k/3yr residual value £27,100
price drop £11,575 retained value 70.1%

https://www.whatcar.com/news/the-10-slowes...019/n15338
Post #768426 13th Apr 2019 3:53pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Siwynne



Member Since: 04 Nov 2016
Location: West lancs
Posts: 578

England 
My Mrs has one of these cars and believe me it is not the gauge indicating incorrectly that will cause it to run out it fuel. It seems to always read less than 10 miles left when I get in. If I tell her about the recall she will blame the car not herself if and when she runs it dry. It took eight weeks for her to tell me it needed adblue.
So I’m staying quiet for now

I can actually hear wifeys all over the country
“honestly, it said I had 50 miles left then it just stopped”.
Post #768442 13th Apr 2019 6:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Joe the Plumber



Member Since: 18 Dec 2013
Location: Midlands
Posts: 907

2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 HT Fuji White
More worryingly, I can imagine irate customers at hair salons throughout the land being unable to go out later after their stylists fail to arrive at work having run out of fuel....
Post #768449 13th Apr 2019 7:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums