↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > General & Technical (L663) > 2020 Defender main discussion thread
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.  Down to end
Page 137 of 351 <123 ... 136137138 ... 349350351>
Print this entire topic · 
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
I think the external styling has been done by these guys - they have form:

https://www.megaflatables.com/inflatable-cars/

Click image to enlarge

Post #806722 18th Dec 2019 8:25am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
chalky



Member Since: 09 May 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 483

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Tonga Green
I’m obviously in the minority here as I’ve never put a defender in a garage at home ? I can also say that I already have a car in my garage so even if I did want to park it up I couldn’t, so it’ll stay on the drive. Where land rovers have been parked for 25 years.

Every else I know uses their garage for storing crap they don’t want in their house.

And who in their right mind would moan about the new car being bigger, I don’t get it, for a start in case again the only one missing the point, the “NEW” one is replacing the 110? The little one parked behind us a 90. This is smaller than a 110.

If you replace the “NEW” one with an “OLD” one in that picture then even the most hard of sight could see the discrepancies between the length oF the two older vehicles.

And to most the most uncomfortable vehicle any smaller ? Who or why would you even want to ? I don’t get why every one is moaning about the new one being bigger ? DEFENDER XS CSW 08 TONGA GREEN
Post #806725 18th Dec 2019 8:51am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
milesr3



Member Since: 12 Feb 2013
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 873

2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Keswick Green
The future just arrived; https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-german...-sav/41534

"So that range increase has come about through making the batteries better, not just bigger...BMW is using the latest evolution of NMC-811 battery technology for the greatest energy density"..."More efficient cells also mean smaller batteries, less weight and less impact on space...this iX3 apparently has the same passenger space as a conventionally powered one"..."the ratio between motor output and what the whole assembly weighs said to have been improved by around 30 per cent"
Post #806735 18th Dec 2019 10:45am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Well I wonder if this is the tech heading JLR's way?

The advances being made in battery tech, as well as motor efficiences seem almost exponential at the moment. Hardly surprising when you add up how much money is being thrown at the problems/issues.

Good to see.
Post #806746 18th Dec 2019 11:39am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
milesr3



Member Since: 12 Feb 2013
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 873

2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Keswick Green
Post #806748 18th Dec 2019 11:52am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
chalky wrote:

And who in their right mind would moan about the new car being bigger, I don’t get it, for a start in case again the only one missing the point, the “NEW” one is replacing the 110? The little one parked behind us a 90. This is smaller than a 110.


Look at the relative size of the doors ~ there should be no difference comparing old 90 to new 110 in that regard. The new doors appear to have a double seal arrangement with each seal a good few inches apart. This may explain why they are that size. The lower door edge on the new vehicle is much lower than the old which stops at the sill, whilst the new one comes down to encase the sill.

Does this make a difference? Open a door in any car park and see how much room you have to get out, it's a function of opening angle and door length.

Another benefit I'm sure most current owners have experienced is another car's door being opened onto yours. At present the resultant ding is their door panel against a rock slider or side step. They always come off worse (as an aside I was sat in mine when a passenger in the adjacent space did just this, swinging their door open with no regard to the consequences. There was a heavy thud as her car door dented quite badly, followed by a series of expletives aimed at me for "causing" the damage to her car.)

The new doors look very vulnerable in this regard.

And then there's B road widths, etc, etc.

Having said all that the rear space in the new 110 did not appear to be overly generous and rounded edges and curves wasted space that could not be packed with boxes, flat timber, etc. Maybe that's the downside to not having a separate chassis, the double skinned nature of the body is a double whammy.
Post #806749 18th Dec 2019 11:53am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
chalky



Member Since: 09 May 2008
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 483

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Tonga Green
Again, it’s odd that the new car should be be the same size or smaller, for me the major selling point would be bigger doors, and again..... I’m clearly the only person who has got into an old one and nearly punctured a kidney on the door striker, I’d rather be able to get in and out and have my my legs in a comfy position than have the comedy steering wheel perched between my knee caps, it’s absurd that people seem hell bent on being able to stack things and slide stuff into the rear load space right up to the roof, how many people actually do that ? And how many have done it thro the tiny rear door of the old one !!!!! Has any one ever thought that the load space in the old one is crap, and the wheel boxes are just ridiculous, tacking boxes in there whilst trying to keep the load level between the wheel boxes must be like jenga, It’s an absolute joke, As for the space in the old one that was so useable, there’s no room in the front, no arm space and no leg space and the seat is prevented from moving back as the bulkhead and later the brace prevents it from being any use as a seat, Perched on top of a box which used to house fuel tanks. the second row in a 110 ! Again no leg space ! Point blank pathetic in terms of transporting 3 fully grown adults in the 2nd row ! And the useable load space ! In the old one it had 4 suicide seats, you couldn’t get in there with a stranger And get not having been aquatinted closely, and you never got In or out without being knee capped by either the rear X member or some one trying to not squash a ball against their leg while being pressed against each other so tightly it was like a cattle truck, yet the new ones too big, who in their right mind sells cars that you can’t travel in comfortably.

The doors on the Old ones are tiny, the vehicle has been outdated for decades, it’s morphed into something that it was never intended to be. And the door denting debate, I heard that nearly 20 years ago when the D3 came out, and the remarks about that were they looked like lift doors where they closed on the B pillar, car parks would be a minefield for the unwary yet here we are. Human beings are gaining in size generation on generation and the problem with a car is that it’s too big but you can’t fill it up to the roof with wood and boxes. DEFENDER XS CSW 08 TONGA GREEN
Post #806808 18th Dec 2019 7:50pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
chalky wrote:
Again, it’s odd that the new car should be be the same size or smaller, for me the major selling point would be bigger doors

Doors sized to/by body size is all I want - big doors just get dinged when opening and catch the wind when out and about.

chalky wrote:
and again..... I’m clearly the only person who has got into an old one and nearly punctured a kidney on the door striker, I’d rather be able to get in and out and have my my legs in a comfy position than have the comedy steering wheel perched between my knee caps

This comes to mind: fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. It's far easier to get into than at least two of my other vehicles.

chalky wrote:
it’s absurd that people seem hell bent on being able to stack things and slide stuff into the rear load space right up to the roof, how many people actually do that ? And how many have done it thro the tiny rear door of the old one !!!!! Has any one ever thought that the load space in the old one is crap, and the wheel boxes are just ridiculous, tacking boxes in there whilst trying to keep the load level between the wheel boxes must be like jenga, It’s an absolute joke,

You know there's a thread on here for loaded up Defenders? Who does it? Everyone who doesn't have the vehicle as a fashion statement and uses some of it's features as it was intended to be used.

chalky wrote:
As for the space in the old one that was so useable, there’s no room in the front, no arm space and no leg space and the seat is prevented from moving back as the bulkhead and later the brace prevents it from being any use as a seat

No bulkhead or brace in my DCPU.

chalky wrote:
Perched on top of a box which used to house fuel tanks. the second row in a 110 ! Again no leg space !

Did the 110 ever have fuel tanks there?

chalky wrote:
Point blank pathetic in terms of transporting 3 fully grown adults in the 2nd row ! And the useable load space ! In the old one it had 4 suicide seats, you couldn’t get in there with a stranger And get not having been aquatinted closely, and you never got In or out without being knee capped by either the rear X member or some one trying to not squash a ball against their leg while being pressed against each other so tightly it was like a cattle truck, yet the new ones too big, who in their right mind sells cars that you can’t travel in comfortably.

I watched the 3rd row of seats on the new defender being demonstrated to a lady - she was quite incredulous as the dealer explained how she was supposed to get in and out to use them. Try them with two adults and the side facing ones in the old defender will seem luxurious by comparison.

chalky wrote:
The doors on the Old ones are tiny, the vehicle has been outdated for decades, it’s morphed into something that it was never intended to be.

It's not really morphed into anything over it's whole life, in part that's one of the actual criticisms of it - lack of investment. For me the last generation of Defender was doing exactly the same job as my Series III was over 30 years previously, yes some things had changed but nothing was truly different.

chalky wrote:
And the door denting debate, I heard that nearly 20 years ago when the D3 came out, and the remarks about that were they looked like lift doors where they closed on the B pillar, car parks would be a minefield for the unwary yet here we are. Human beings are gaining in size generation on generation and the problem with a car is that it’s too big but you can’t fill it up to the roof with wood and boxes.


And there you have it - the Discovery is really the vehicle you want and JLR have catered for you and your requirements. You have in "fixing" what you think is wrong with the Defender, spec'd up a Discovery. So just go and buy one if it's right for you. I've had a couple of them and they were great...but they are not a Defender.
Post #807145 21st Dec 2019 10:13am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JordanBefender



Member Since: 29 Aug 2019
Location: York
Posts: 16

United Kingdom 
Re:
for the people talking about the size, these appeared on instagram,

https://www.instagram.com/p/B6OAOGJJMJv/
Post #807155 21st Dec 2019 1:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Zed



Member Since: 07 Oct 2017
Location: In the woods
Posts: 3254

United Kingdom 2010 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Santorini Black
Christ, that white and black combo looks awful. WARNING.
This post may contain sarcasm.
Post #807157 21st Dec 2019 1:16pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Fat Cog



Member Since: 19 Mar 2012
Location: Oxfordshire & Devon
Posts: 502

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
I'm probably one of the few who hasn't seen one close up yet but earlier today I was driving through Fenny Compton village (Warks) & spotted this 110 parked up...pulled over for a gander & took a few shots with my 90 for scale; looks so much better in the flesh (in my opinion of course)...actually now looking forward to the 90.



Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge




Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge
 Since 1973...S1, Air Portable's, Defender's, but only my Wolf TUL HS GS remains
Post #807167 21st Dec 2019 4:18pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Lots of photos now of Defenders parked up next to one, but not seen any yet of an old school Discovery...that would be an interesting comparison.
Post #807171 21st Dec 2019 5:33pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Fat Cog



Member Since: 19 Mar 2012
Location: Oxfordshire & Devon
Posts: 502

United Kingdom 2016 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 HT Corris Grey
Agreed...although I still think the new Defender will attract far more D4/D5 owners than existing owners.

I really LIKE the new Defender but LOVE my Wolf & Puma! Since 1973...S1, Air Portable's, Defender's, but only my Wolf TUL HS GS remains
Post #807173 21st Dec 2019 5:44pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Mike c



Member Since: 11 Aug 2017
Location: Maldon, Essex
Posts: 928

England 2004 Defender 90 Td5 CSW Belize Green
It is a new Discovery and no doubt the D5 will be dropped soon depending on how the new "Defender" sells. But irrelevant of how it looks it is far too complex, impractical and expensive to be a utility Land Rover replacement, but it's very clear they do not want that market anymore which is fair enough in a economic sense.

RIP Land Rover.
Post #807174 21st Dec 2019 5:46pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Fat Cog wrote:
I really LIKE the new Defender but

Rather reminds me of:

"Women are like elephants. I like to look at 'em, but I wouldn't want to own one."
W. C. Fields
Post #807175 21st Dec 2019 5:47pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.  Back to top
Page 137 of 351 <123 ... 136137138 ... 349350351>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums