Home > Puma (Tdci) > REVERSING IN HIGH RATIO IN MY 90 |
|
|
custom90 Member Since: 21 Jan 2010 Location: South West, England. Posts: 20359 |
Reverse is a taller gear ratio slightly than 1st, just the way it is. You could always use reverse in low range instead.
Most likely better for tight manovering, especially with a load on. |
||
24th Jul 2016 11:08am |
|
Bluest Member Since: 23 Apr 2016 Location: Lancashire Posts: 4209 |
It sounds like it is activating the increased idle speed that you should only get in first/reverse low range. I can imagine that would be very tricky. Does it do the same in first? Unfortunately I have no suggestions on how to fix it, someone is sure to know though. Sounds like a switch somewhere to me.
|
||
24th Jul 2016 11:17am |
|
Caterham Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Birmingham Posts: 6298 |
As above.
There is a 'switch' I presume mounted on the transfer box adjacent to the linkage that jacks the revs up in low range to assist with matching revs in 1st n reverse and assist in effectively reducing torq in the lowest gear ratios. Sounds either like switch is broke / disconnected or badly adjusted such that it thinks it's in low range when it's not. Good luck. |
||
24th Jul 2016 12:15pm |
|
johnp1887 Member Since: 24 Jul 2016 Location: Kirkby Lonsdale Posts: 32 |
Thanks for the info, there are 2 switches on the transfer box, one will be for the diff lock warning light and I assume the other will be the hi/lo switch, I had thought that one would be for the reverse lights, but I have been told that the reverse lamp switch is on the main 'box
thanks for the help |
||
24th Jul 2016 12:58pm |
|
Caterham Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Birmingham Posts: 6298 |
YEP on main box for reverse.
let us know how you get on. |
||
24th Jul 2016 2:09pm |
|
Happyoldgit Member Since: 14 Sep 2007 Location: Norfolk Posts: 3471 |
I don't think there is anything wrong TBH, all my Puma's have been very much the same. Low range is your friend when maneuvering in reverse. Steve.
Owned numerous Land Rover vehicles of all shapes and sizes over the decades. Current Defender: A non tarts hand-bagged Puma 110 XS USW. [Insert something impressive here such as extensive list of previous Land Rovers or examples of your prestigeous and expensive items, trinkets, houses, bikes, vehicles etc] http://forums.lr4x4.com I used to be Miserable ...but now I'm ecstatic. |
||
24th Jul 2016 7:24pm |
|
Caterham Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Birmingham Posts: 6298 |
Steve, I think we're talking increased revs in Hi range not Lo
|
||
24th Jul 2016 7:26pm |
|
Happyoldgit Member Since: 14 Sep 2007 Location: Norfolk Posts: 3471 |
Yes I know that. My point was that reversing [on tick over in high range] is often a bit speedy, hence my suggestion to use low range. In fact Land Rover used to recommend using low range for tricky reversing situations rather than slipping the clutch in high. Steve.
Owned numerous Land Rover vehicles of all shapes and sizes over the decades. Current Defender: A non tarts hand-bagged Puma 110 XS USW. [Insert something impressive here such as extensive list of previous Land Rovers or examples of your prestigeous and expensive items, trinkets, houses, bikes, vehicles etc] http://forums.lr4x4.com I used to be Miserable ...but now I'm ecstatic. |
||
24th Jul 2016 7:38pm |
|
Riccarton Member Since: 10 Aug 2015 Location: Gods' Own Country Posts: 280 |
I think you may need to compare it with another to give you a starting point.
My 2.2 (and to fair my 2.4 3 vehicles ago) spends at least 75% of its time towing and whenever I arrive home things are fairly tight. I only need low range for the final manouvring (Ifor lives beneath the cattle box with approx' 3 inch per side clearance). The rev increase is noticeable (idle-jack) in low range but never a problem in high range. If you try another at least you'll have something to gauge it by. Incidentally, are you getting mixed up with the "anti-stall"? If you allow it to settle down by reversing a decent distance with the clutch out does it calm down? |
||
24th Jul 2016 8:11pm |
|
Cupboard Member Since: 21 Mar 2014 Location: Suffolk Posts: 2971 |
Idle jack should only happen in low range, tickover in high range should be tickover and that's that.
Thing with low range is that whilst the gearbox knows it's in low, it doesn't know it's in first or reverse. The ECU guesses based on your speed. That can make the car seem a bit broken if you're waiting for something to happen in low neutral and it occasionally revs itself for no apparent reason. |
||
24th Jul 2016 8:15pm |
|
Caterham Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Birmingham Posts: 6298 |
Fare enough.......but even mine doesn't tick over at 1100rpm in Hi so I think the issue here is he's experiencing idle jack in Hi and finding it too quick? Me thinks? P.s. I'm off to check on my clatter |
||
24th Jul 2016 8:41pm |
|
Wild Card 90 Member Since: 03 Dec 2014 Location: Gerlingen Posts: 1060 |
I wasnīt sure when I first read this thread, but driving my 2.2 this morning, I noted that the governed idle stays at 800 rpm in first or reverse with the clutch engaged. The idle only going up to 1100 rpm in low range. There must be a mechanical switch somewhere on the box that passes the info onto the ECU/electronic throttle, and it is more than likely that this or the harness is faulty, or the plug has come loose. Might be a really easy fix, and a massive source of satisfaction, being able to solve the problem without getting a dealer or workshop involved . I'd suggest a quick look underneath, with a torch 1998 Tdi 90 SW,
2008 Td4 90 SW, 2012 2.2 90 SW, 2" raised Trailmaster/Terrafirma Heavy Track Raids, 255 MTīs, Recaro CSīs, anorak, wellingtons |
||
25th Jul 2016 8:31am |
|
Caterham Member Since: 06 Nov 2008 Location: Birmingham Posts: 6298 |
I believe it only goes up to 1100 rpm once it's registered some movement (IIRC).
|
||
25th Jul 2016 8:34am |
|
Bluest Member Since: 23 Apr 2016 Location: Lancashire Posts: 4209 |
The revs go up on my 2.4 as soon as you start to lift the clutch in 1st/reverse low range, no movement needed.
|
||
25th Jul 2016 3:52pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis