↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Off Topic > Cheaper to run, Defender or Discovery 3/4
Which is cheaper to run, Discovery 3,4 or Defender 110
Discovery 3
6%
 6%  [2]
Discovery 4
10%
 10%  [3]
Defender 110
82%
 82%  [24]
Total Votes: 29

Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
shaggydog



Member Since: 12 Aug 2012
Location: Kent
Posts: 3347

United Kingdom 1991 Defender 110 200 Tdi USW Arles Blue
Cheaper to run, Defender or Discovery 3/4
Chatting with some colleagues at work today and the subject of vehicle running costs came up.

I'm never going to win this one but it got me thinking about what I would replace my 110 with if I absolutely had to.

So for those of you who currently have got both or have had both, which was cheaper to run?

Both would be the diesel discovery (can't stand petrol engines)

Obviously there will be a huge amount of variables but I think most people have a good idea of what there truck costs on a monthly basis.

It would be used for daily driver doing about 26,000 a year so its worth considering!

Thoughts please Thumbs Up Running Restoration Thread http://www.defender2.net/forum/post323197.html#323197

Self confessed mileage hunter Very Happy
Post #513137 11th Mar 2016 10:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
MartinK



Member Since: 02 Mar 2011
Location: Silverdale (Lancashire/Cumbria Border)
Posts: 2665

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Orkney Grey
Defender residual values are much better - lower depreciation
Tyres - wow - Defender much cheaper
Road tax - another wedge saved

MPG not wildly different

No brainer - 110 much cheaper Defender "Puma" 2.4 110 County Utility (possibly the last of the 2.4's)
Post #513161 11th Mar 2016 11:53am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Inigo



Member Since: 13 Nov 2011
Location: Kent
Posts: 617

United Kingdom 2012 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Orkney Grey
I've run a secondhand Discovery 4 alongside the Defender for the last year and the Discovery has cost way more.

Admittedly it has more miles on it (50,000) so more parts need replacing, but in the last year I've replaced brake discs all round, front suspension arms and suspension compressor (compressor covered by expensive warranty £700 per year), fuel level sensor (not covered by warranty, but LR covered it under goodwill).

Trickier to do work yourself and more issues with electronics, wiring, sensors, ecu's etc. However, it is a lovely place to be and very different to the defender. About to visit Chamonix and while last year we drove to the alps in the Defender, I wouldn't really want to do it again. Quite looking forward to enjoying the heated steering wheel and remote control park heating - both of which you could do with a Defender (and mine has heated seats!) but you'd be doing it yourself, while the Disco has them built in.
Post #513170 11th Mar 2016 12:17pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
discomog



Member Since: 09 May 2015
Location: Notts/Lincs Border
Posts: 2530

United Kingdom 2015 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 XS CSW Santorini Black
I've had both Defenders and Disco 3/4. I happen to love them both but have to be honest and say that if I were travelling 26,000 miles a year and a good percentage of that was motorway then it would have to be the Disco. If you want miles per gallon then go for the Disco, if on the other hand you prefer smiles per gallon then definitely the Defender. Sorry it's not a lot of help but you can't go far wrong with either IMHO. Defender 90XS SW
Mini Countryman Cooper S
Morgan Plus 8
Post #513176 11th Mar 2016 12:44pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RED-DOT



Member Since: 29 Jun 2009
Location: stirling
Posts: 2363

Scotland 
I'll stick my head above the trench here and throw a stick in the spokes...... The D2 if still made would still outsell the Defender (because it was better) and a better all round vehicle in every way. 2008 RS4 gone, 123d M Sport, and a Puma 90 XS..
Post #513182 11th Mar 2016 12:53pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
shaggydog



Member Since: 12 Aug 2012
Location: Kent
Posts: 3347

United Kingdom 1991 Defender 110 200 Tdi USW Arles Blue
I had a feeling the Disco's would be more expensive to run.

Hopefully it would never come to it as I love my 110 ad would hate to part from it it was more an exercise in what if?


Interesting to see other peoples experiences with them though Thumbs Up Running Restoration Thread http://www.defender2.net/forum/post323197.html#323197

Self confessed mileage hunter Very Happy
Post #513183 11th Mar 2016 12:54pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
shaggydog



Member Since: 12 Aug 2012
Location: Kent
Posts: 3347

United Kingdom 1991 Defender 110 200 Tdi USW Arles Blue
I agree with you there red-dot, those discos were fantastic.

In my opinion pig ugly, the best thing other than Defender to come out of LR was the Disco 3 bodyshape but the vehicles themselves were great.

I used to mow a field with a V8 disco2 which which was great fun, till the owner picked up a ton sack of ballast with it and broke its back. Then swapped to a Td5 metropolis version but he never got the idea with vehicle maintenance and it was run into the ground after about 6 years of abuse. Running Restoration Thread http://www.defender2.net/forum/post323197.html#323197

Self confessed mileage hunter Very Happy
Post #513186 11th Mar 2016 1:02pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RED-DOT



Member Since: 29 Jun 2009
Location: stirling
Posts: 2363

Scotland 
I bought the 2nd last ever D2 commercial and ran it for four years without fault other than wet carpets and a twig in the heater fan. It was a simple vehicle unlike D3/4 and even with the extra weight it would go anywhere my 90 would with confidence. My local LR outlet reckons they could still sell them due to the enquiries they get for clean used examples. 2008 RS4 gone, 123d M Sport, and a Puma 90 XS..
Post #513190 11th Mar 2016 1:13pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Lost for Words



Member Since: 18 Jun 2015
Location: Warminster, Wiltshire
Posts: 200

I don't have a Defender of my own to compare with, but I would concur that a D3 is likely to cost more. More comfortable @ 26k a year though... Thumbs Up Visiting from DISCO3.CO.UK
Discovery 3 TDV6 Auto HSE Zambezi Silver
Post #513234 11th Mar 2016 3:50pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Mother superior



Member Since: 05 Aug 2013
Location: Surrey
Posts: 504

United Kingdom 
gents
Got a 2015 D4 and a 110, reckon the deafner is a bit better on fuel and running costs, but I'm a Disco man at heart........
Wes Oh woe, oh woe
My crusty old landrover,
It will not go.
Post #513235 11th Mar 2016 3:50pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RobKeay



Member Since: 19 Jul 2009
Location: Stafford
Posts: 1585

United Kingdom 2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Corris Grey
D2 was replaced by the freelander2 isn't it same size. Plus probably better off road. The overhang on the rear of a d2 is rather long.

Had a D3 and was great apart from being the size of the moon.

110 is my daily now and does want I need and cheap to fix.
Post #513296 11th Mar 2016 6:20pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
RED-DOT



Member Since: 29 Jun 2009
Location: stirling
Posts: 2363

Scotland 
Wrong i'm afraid. The FL2 replaced the FL1 and the D2 was replaced by the D3. Simples! 2008 RS4 gone, 123d M Sport, and a Puma 90 XS..
Post #513299 11th Mar 2016 6:27pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
chasthechippie



Member Since: 15 Aug 2014
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 60

England 
Run a 2014 Disco 4 commercial + 2015 Defender utility. Disco is miles better on fuel and being honest miles better at everything else as well inc towing etc Defender is only top on one thing nostalgia!!
Post #513374 11th Mar 2016 9:14pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
mick



Member Since: 08 Feb 2010
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 2109

England 2010 Defender 130 Puma 2.4 HCPU Rimini Red
+1 although my defenders for work
And the D2 are at an age that the chassis are getting foobar now
Post #513378 11th Mar 2016 9:20pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Projectblue



Member Since: 22 Nov 2011
Location: Devon
Posts: 1096

England 
This is relatively straight forward. Ignoring residuals and initial purchase price, just running costs, the D3/4 is far more expensive.

1. Brakes - the Disco is heavy and eats discs and pads. On 26k you might be lucky to make it to the next annual service on one set of pads.
2. Bushes - depending on the age/mileage they wear bushes out faster.
3. Tyres - same thing
4. General reliability - whilst they both might suffer some reliability issues, the Defender is much easier to fix yourself so reduces dealer repair bills.

That said, 26k per year is a lot of miles and whilst I like the Defender driving seat, for that many miles I'd be searching for some thing more comfortable Thumbs Up New project and it's green: www.projectoverland.info
Post #513420 12th Mar 2016 12:40am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums