↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Maintenance & Modifications > Front recovery point - hooks or something else?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
gaijin



Member Since: 25 Feb 2015
Location: Lausanne
Posts: 9

Switzerland 
Front recovery point - hooks or something else?
Hello,

I'm happy that I am once again a Defender owner. Trying to sort out what to do with front recovery points. I've used hooks like this https://www.expeditionexchange.com/curt/ but beefier and without the retaining clip. But that was in the middle east almost exclusively on sand.

Now in Europe, everyone seems to have jate rings or other points that use a shackle. What I liked about the hooks you could use a recovery strap without having to use a shackle. Figured that taking a potential projectile out of the equation was a good thing (plus it was just faster.)

Is there an advantage to using jate rings or another shackle based system? In the sand the pulls could be rather high energy and generally pretty straight. Not sure the same applies to the terrain here, but I'm, for the time being, fairly ignorant about driving in mud and rocks. (on the latter: anyone in Switzerland (VD/GE or France) willing to show me the ropes?)

Thanks
Post #417665 20th Apr 2015 5:36pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Laurie



Member Since: 22 Feb 2008
Location: Sussex, England
Posts: 2897

England 2005 Defender 90 Td5 XS CSW Bonatti Grey
Having anything protruding from the front bumper could be an MoT/Euro test failure.
Better use Jate rings or a heavy duty bumper with a recessed pin hitch. 
Post #417680 20th Apr 2015 6:23pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Send e-mail Reply with quote
gaijin



Member Since: 25 Feb 2015
Location: Lausanne
Posts: 9

Switzerland 
Thanks. Will hooks fail an MOT even if they are mounted under the van on the chassis, meaning you can't even see them?
Post #417875 21st Apr 2015 9:29am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
blackwolf



Member Since: 03 Nov 2009
Location: South West England
Posts: 17313

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 DCPU Stornoway Grey
No, and I don't think that front towing pintles/jaws protruding from the bumper will fail the MOT (mine never have), though you ought to make your insurer aware of them.

I think that the reason so many opt for JATE rings is ease of mounting - you don't have to figure out a custom mount of adequate strength, which you will have to do if you want to mount hooks.
Post #417877 21st Apr 2015 9:59am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
McGeordie



Member Since: 20 Feb 2012
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 220

United Kingdom 2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Montalcino Red
I've installed these from one of our helpful and friendly sponsors...not used them in anger yet...but the look and feel the business:

http://www.4x4overlander.com/product/gmb-recovery-eyes/
Post #417884 21st Apr 2015 10:33am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Pickles



Member Since: 26 May 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3779

Australia 2013 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Keswick Green
McGeordie, I've seen them, & I believe they look very well engineered, but I've never seen what they look like installed on a Defender. Any chance of putting up a few good pics?
Pickles.
Post #417901 21st Apr 2015 12:18pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Are the bumper mounting bolts, or more to the point the surrounding chassis set up to take the sort of loading a heavy recovery could have?

Look at the chassis reinforcements where Jate rings fit & compare.

I have never used them but I am intrigued by the soft rope shackles on the market. A good idea to take the metal shackle out of the equation perhaps?
Post #417907 21st Apr 2015 12:33pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
McGeordie



Member Since: 20 Feb 2012
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 220

United Kingdom 2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Montalcino Red
Pickles here you go, they mount on as over and through the chassis legs as per the bumper.

I'm not sure how they'd hold up if you were using them for heavy recovery, but for what I need they seem spot on.

Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge
Post #417914 21st Apr 2015 12:48pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
zone30



Member Since: 07 Sep 2012
Location: Gent
Posts: 669

Belgium 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 X-Tech LE Nara Bronze
They should be fine if the bumper is HD. If not, buy a bumper with eyes welded in.
Post #417917 21st Apr 2015 12:54pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Does it make any difference if the bumper is HD or not if it's still only attached by the two bumper mounting bolts?
Post #418007 21st Apr 2015 7:07pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
McGeordie



Member Since: 20 Feb 2012
Location: Central Scotland
Posts: 220

United Kingdom 2014 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 USW Montalcino Red
They came from Brendan at 4x4 Overlander and are made by GMB, I can't see anything that says you need an HD Bumper...but I'm sure Brendan would be delighted to provide insight...as I said for me they are fine for what I need...I don't do too much testing stuff and don't want to go for anything over the top, when most of the time its a really practical family wagon.
Post #418031 21st Apr 2015 8:10pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
kmac



Member Since: 07 Oct 2009
Location: Middlesex
Posts: 1308

United Kingdom 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 USW Santorini Black
Got this on my Santorini black 110, from Devon 4x4 - Heavy duty bumper with towing eyes
They used to be closer to £100 though, now over £200


Post #418053 21st Apr 2015 8:45pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Windowlicker



Member Since: 24 Aug 2014
Location: East yorks
Posts: 290

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Stornoway Grey
Not sure whether you have a steering guard or not, but if not then maybe something like I fitted, for the same reasons as yourself ( no solid tow points on the front as standard )
http://www.defender2.net/forum/topic34663.html

They are also available without the 2" receiver if you just want to use the two tow eyes already mounted.

As I mentioned in my post in the link, I have the option now of choosing/using any bumper variety, as it doesn't need to be HD enough to withstand recoveries nor be beefy enough to mount tow eyes to.

Cheers, Thumbs Up

Nick. "Procrastination is the thief of time"
Post #418073 21st Apr 2015 9:43pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Pickles



Member Since: 26 May 2013
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 3779

Australia 2013 Defender 90 Puma 2.2 CSW Keswick Green
McGeordie wrote:
Pickles here you go, they mount on as over and through the chassis legs as per the bumper.

I'm not sure how they'd hold up if you were using them for heavy recovery, but for what I need they seem spot on.

Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge



Click image to enlarge

Yes, Mcgeordie, they are definitely the best I've seen, for my purpose anyway.
I don't envisage any "heavy duty" off road stuff, so these should be fine for me.
Did you have to take the bumper off to fit?
Any chance of just one more pic, standing a bit back from the front of your Defender (something like Kmac's image of his front bar!), so that I can get an idea of what the general vehicle looks like with 'em on?
Thanks, Pickles.
Post #418077 21st Apr 2015 10:08pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Supacat



Member Since: 16 Oct 2012
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 11018

United Kingdom 2013 Defender 110 Puma 2.2 XS DCPU Keswick Green
Pickles - have a look here:

http://www.lro.com/detail/motors/4x4s/land...-110/56421



Here's my concern with mounting a recovery point off the bumper fixings:


Click image to enlarge


Click image to enlarge


The metal at the end of the chassis legs is folded over but not welded together, and underneath the curved sections look like deliberately deformable crush cans to limit the cost of low impact repairs.

Compare to the chassis where the Jate rings fit - there's an extra length of metal folded and welded in:

Click image to enlarge


If your vehicle ever gets stuck remember how heavy it is, together with factoring in a level of safety. A final thought - if the point does fail during a recovery then it's flying through the air - not towards you but the good samaritan who's pulling you or the person you have offered to help - rather embarassing then when the shackle goes flying through their windscreen!

I'd refuse to recover off that point unless I was really desparate.
Post #418106 22nd Apr 2015 7:29am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums