 | Home > Wheels & Tyres > general grabbers |
 
|
|
|
| munch90 Member Since: 26 Oct 2013 Location: guildford Posts: 3558  
|
general grabbers AT or AT2
anyone had both and what do you think is best mainly whats quiet |
||
13th Feb 2015 3:57pm |
|
| StephenO Member Since: 03 Dec 2010 Location: Glasgow Posts: 246 
|
Ran AT's on my D3, great tyre and got 40k out of them
 2007 Defender Puma Tonga Green
2015 Range Rover Sport Autobiography Corrie Grey 1968 Series 2a Bronze Green 1995 Defender 90 Coniston Green 2005 Discovery 3 Zambezi Silver Last edited by StephenO on 14th Feb 2015 12:11am. Edited 1 time in total |
||
|
13th Feb 2015 8:08pm |
|
| ian series 1 Member Since: 17 Nov 2014 Location: south Posts: 3127  
|
I too would also say about 40000, they do last well up to a point then they seem to wear very quick,
I'm on BFG all terrains at the moment on the 90, not a patch on AT2s 80" 80" 86" 88" 90" Wanted, Forward Control Anything considered. |
||
|
13th Feb 2015 8:14pm |
|
| captain slow Member Since: 22 Jun 2011 Location: Herts Posts: 356 
|
In my experience AT2s lasted longer, but had very soft sidewalks. The AT drove better on road. There was not a lot of difference Offroad. Neither coped well in mud or snow. In the end I went for Goodyear duratrac and was very pleased. Just as quiet, good in snow and better in mud. 2.2 Tdci 110 XS CSW Corris Grey
Prince Harry's D3 (gone but not forgotten) 300 Tdi 110 CSW (gone but not forgotten) |
||
|
13th Feb 2015 8:15pm |
|
| RobKeay Member Since: 19 Jul 2009 Location: Stafford Posts: 1585 
|
Had at2 on my D3 and did what I needed, good tyre. Noisier tyre but not bad off-road. It's not a mud tyre but it certainly won't embarrass you. Last well.
I hated the AT always had them removed from day one of getting TD5's or early Tdci. Once you have driven with AT2 or bfg or Goodyear you will never want them again. |
||
|
13th Feb 2015 9:19pm |
|
| munch90 Member Since: 26 Oct 2013 Location: guildford Posts: 3558
|
Never had g/grabbers before apart from the tr's it came on , which were just terrible to drive on
always had bfg 's mud now all terrians on 18 inch boasts , mine are as new but fancy a change i like the look of the at , but think the at2 is the more modern maybe better tyre not worried about how they last, would rather have a soft tyre that grips well |
||
|
13th Feb 2015 9:48pm |
|
| RobKeay Member Since: 19 Jul 2009 Location: Stafford Posts: 1585
|
I ment TR not AT. It's the TR I've had before. Never had AT sorry about that ignore me.
|
||
|
13th Feb 2015 9:56pm |
|
| captain slow Member Since: 22 Jun 2011 Location: Herts Posts: 356
|
My understanding was that GGAT2s are the older design and the GGATs the more modern tyre? 2.2 Tdci 110 XS CSW Corris Grey Prince Harry's D3 (gone but not forgotten) 300 Tdi 110 CSW (gone but not forgotten) |
||
|
14th Feb 2015 12:02am |
|
| munch90 Member Since: 26 Oct 2013 Location: guildford Posts: 3558
|
Could be right there!
I didnt even know which one is the later pattern !  |
||
|
14th Feb 2015 4:26am |
|
| ian series 1 Member Since: 17 Nov 2014 Location: south Posts: 3127
|
AT are the later pattern,
Some sizes in the AT2 were discontinued ....255/55/18 can even be tricky to find and that's a standard disco size Which is why I ended up going for the new AT, at 25thou they are wearing very well, 80" 80" 86" 88" 90" Wanted, Forward Control Anything considered. |
||
|
14th Feb 2015 7:02am |
|
| munch90 Member Since: 26 Oct 2013 Location: guildford Posts: 3558
|
anyone got or can confirm ?
general grabbers list a 275/65/18 AT but can only find a 275/65/18 AT2 can find a 275/70/18 AT I have a height issue that really needs a 275/65 the 275/70 might make a difference |
||
|
14th Feb 2015 9:35am |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
