↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > ECU self learning ?
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
landybehr



Member Since: 17 Apr 2013
Location: -D-
Posts: 173

ECU self learning ?
Hi,

Iīve recently heard that the ECU of my 2.2TDCi is a self learning ECU. It will adapt to my driving style and watch out every 1000miles or so if it has to re-learn again. IIRC.
Thought I should ask here too, what are the parameters that let the ECU do what in the end?

I know that there is a whole bunch of sensors that give input to the ECU but there must be sth. more specific to it. Because all/most of the sensorsīs info is relevant regardless of the driver, like f.i. a coolant temp sensor alone cannot tell the ECU anything about me..
Post #323612 14th Apr 2014 8:37am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
martinfiattech



Member Since: 13 Nov 2013
Location: leicester
Posts: 422

England 
ECU self learning does not exactly learn your driving style, or cycle.
The ecu has parameters for sensor, actuator, injector, oil, dpf. Drift away from original manufactures specifications to allow for wear and tear old age, ect.
On our multi air systems we have to carry out a cambelt relearn on fitting a new cambelt just to keep everything happy.

So with self learning the ecu can use it`s own built in adaption map, as to whether a component is good bad or indifferent.

Also to bare in mind a lot of components can and do give a calculated value to the ecu most air mass meters send a calculated signal / value which the ecu acts apon so the ecu is working on a pre calculated value from said sensor.

So if said sensor is faulty the ecu works on a preset value or its own map by looking at other sensors and making up its own mind as to what said faulty sensor should be displaying / sending . thus keeping the vehicle up time extended and keeping the vehicle away from the dealer longer.
So some times the data list you see on your diagnostic computer may not be the truth, as the ecu can and will alter the given / displayed value, we call this an adaption slope.
One must be careful when working on said systems, it`s all well good replacing sensors clearing codes.
But if you go in and start relearning given values the controller that was once happy with a given value from a component is now given a new value which maybe outside of specifications straight away and now you have a new fault which you have accidently created.
On the other hand some times with vehicles that have faults and I can think of one ducato van I had, excessive black smoke, no power, poor mpg.

Pluged in examiner code read, mass air flow adaption out of limits.
While the computer was doing its thing I was going thru the service book and yes 35,000 miles over due service, poped out air filter blacker than the ace of spades.
Well one new air filter clear codes, but mass air flow would not clear.
Hmm I could see the given value was what I expected to see 693 mg at idle speed, but the fault would not clear.
In this case a relearn of given values reset the ecu cleared codes.
I actualy had to lie to the ecu and tell it there was a new mass air flow meter fitted so it would reset it`s adaption slope this saved the customer from buying a new air mass meter on re checking the given value for the mass air flow it was the same 693 mg.
Data is a good thing but is it true.

This is very common with semi auto transmissions if the fluid pressure sensor goes down the ecu defaults to full system pressure setting then monitors hydraulic pump current draw, as the draw rises to max the ecu pulls the pump down to try and keep the system going ect. It will even show you a pressure reading of what you expect to see, crafty eh!

The deeper you go into these things the more mislead you can get. You can buy all the scan tools and scopes, visit forums etc.
But you must understand the basics of the system and NEVER forget the basics of fault finding. Excuse the spelling I`am better with spanners and wires.
Post #325067 21st Apr 2014 1:05pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Cupboard



Member Since: 21 Mar 2014
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 2971

United Kingdom 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 HT Corris Grey
Now that was an extremely interesting post.

Thanks Thumbs Up
Post #325144 21st Apr 2014 6:01pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ericvv



Member Since: 02 Jun 2011
Location: Near the Jet d'Eau
Posts: 5816

Switzerland 2009 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SVX Station Wagon Santorini Black
Post #325145 21st Apr 2014 6:10pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
munch90



Member Since: 26 Oct 2013
Location: guildford
Posts: 3558

England 
they not so much self learning as driver reactive , if you drive steady they act steady , but give them a bit of stick they become bit more responsive , if that makes sense

bit hard to explain really

with the rover mems system they did sort of learn and that was called a jack count resetting could sort some idle problems and few other problems after changing things
Post #325152 21st Apr 2014 6:36pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
martinfiattech



Member Since: 13 Nov 2013
Location: leicester
Posts: 422

England 
Self adaptive parameters within vehicle ecus or as the now like to call them NODES thanks to can and multplexed systems, have been around for easily 15 years that I `ve seen.
Since the launch of bosch motronic 1,5 on Vauxhall vehicles I`am sure they had a adaption slope for idle air control, air flow meter ect. mind you I was a trainee back then it was 1990 just when carbs were going out the window and cats were appearing.

Common rail diesels in the last 15 to 20 years are doing the same thing, with tighter emissions regulations longer service intervals the customer demands more and expects more.
Lets face it if some one told you 20 years ago the police would be driving round in high powered diesel skodas you would laugh your head off.

Adaptive parameters give the nodes of the vehicle a larger window of error along with the move to digital data transmission over analog data means the vehicle can carry on running with a poor signal from a sensor.
Where once all data went along a serial line via a sine wave the node needed to see that waveform in its entireity to understand it.

With digital data and a square wave or duty cycle waveform the node can see the signal and check it against its maps the amplitude of the signal is now less important so as long as it sees something it will work with it or do its best to work around it .
I`am sure there are computer folk who can explain this better than me

So that's about it my self I pefere the bosch edc systems over the ford Visteon systems we have in our landrovers. Oh well I would have liked the Iveco 2.3 multijet engine to, its much better Excuse the spelling I`am better with spanners and wires.
Post #325171 21st Apr 2014 7:55pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums