↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > Rear brake solution. Discs, Callipers & Pads.
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 1
Print this entire topic · 
Ed



Member Since: 17 Aug 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 14

United Kingdom 2007 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Zermatt Silver
Rear brake solution. Discs, Callipers & Pads.
I have the TDCI with ABS fitted. The callipers at the rear seem sticky on the pistons and really, really rattly whilst driving down the road (I'm assuming that's the pads as lightly touching the brakes whilst coasting solves this noise). Anyhew, can't put up with the noise any longer and looking to change over for new parts maybe even uprated..

My question being, what is the general consensus of upgraded parts with you all (discs/callipers&pads).. Whilst it's being done I may as well do it right and wondered if anyone else has hints or tips on which direction or brand to go with.. Land Rover does 50/50 road & trail normally towing a couple of horses in a trailer.

Cheers guys looking forward to your experience.
Post #250953 12th Jul 2013 7:15pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
WarPig



Member Since: 04 Dec 2009
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 1748

England 1996 Defender 110 300 Tdi USW Bonatti Grey
Geobloke on here has upgraded his Puma to Paddocks High Performance solid drilled & grooved discs (Proline brand) and although Ive not seen him post any followup posts, I think he was very happy with them.

Ive since purchased a full set for my 300tdi, along with Greenstuff pads. I havent got them fitted yet though. I know some folk say the grooves might get filled with mud and wear the pads out, but I only do road driving so I decided to bite the bullet.

Upgrading to vented discs may require different callipers due to the size of the discs.
Post #250958 12th Jul 2013 7:39pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
geobloke



Member Since: 06 Nov 2012
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 4410

United Kingdom 
WarPig wrote:
Geobloke on here has upgraded his Puma to Paddocks High Performance solid drilled & grooved discs (Proline brand) and although Ive not seen him post any followup posts, I think he was very happy with them.

Ive since purchased a full set for my 300tdi, along with Greenstuff pads. I havent got them fitted yet though. I know some folk say the grooves might get filled with mud and wear the pads out, but I only do road driving so I decided to bite the bullet.

Upgrading to vented discs may require different callipers due to the size of the discs.


Where does the time go eh?! I can not believe it has been over 2 months since I posted about fitting the disks and pads to my 110. Although I have to admit it is a TD5 not a Puma... Whistle

The setup: Front - Proline (Paddocks) Vented, Grooved and Drilled disks and Green Stuff Pads; Rear - Proline (Paddocks) Grooved and Drilled disks and standard LR pads (there are apparently no greenstuff pads for a 110...)

Just over a month ago I came back from a 4 week tour of France and Spain with a heavily laden 110 and quite simply I owe these disks and pads some serious appreciation. The disks and pads have now covered just over 6k miles and are well and truly bedded in, working well. The extra stopping power you get from fitting this setup is superb, seriously superb, amazing in fact. If I was to guesstimate how much I would say that the stopping distance in the dry has reduced by about 1/3rd compared to standard. The real difference is felt when the 110 is laden or towing, the difference makes the expense very worthwhile. I am sure I have these disks and pads to thank for avoiding a number of "brave" Spaniards cutting us up at rush hour just outside Seville...

If you know the mountain roads of the Pyrenees like I now do then you will appreciate the fade resistant greenstuff pads, they really do work very well once warm, can be a little wooden when cold and create quite a lot of brake dust. I will be doing a 6k mile service shortly and will check on wear rate, but i wouldn't be surprised if they are wearing quicker than standard LR pads.

Since being back the 110 has done a number of long drives, whilst mostly empty and I can quite happily say that you should keep an eye out for the poor bloke behind you when braking as he will not expect a Defender to stop as quickly as he can... and I mean that...

I will also say that your braking ability is only as good as the entire setup, if you have duff calipers or old brake fluid then fitting uprated disks and pads is like me wearing £400 trainers and expecting to beat Hussein Bolt Wink

I am a happy customer, after 6k miles.
Post #251007 12th Jul 2013 11:20pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
WarPig



Member Since: 04 Dec 2009
Location: Sheffield
Posts: 1748

England 1996 Defender 110 300 Tdi USW Bonatti Grey
Thanks for the update, nice to hear your pleased with them Thumbs Up

Im getting mine fitted next week. Ive gone for solid grooved drilled at front & rear with Green Stuff pads. They do have the pads for the 110 rear upto my chassis number, im guessing not for TD5 though?

http://www.paddockspares.com/da4185-ebc-ex...-rear.html
Post #251011 13th Jul 2013 12:42am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Dave-H



Member Since: 08 Feb 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1507

England 2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Tonga Green
Concur ... EBC Greenstuff are available for TD5 110, i fitted a set [along with Terrafirma discs] to landytom's 110 last year.

Superior stopping power, but they do wear quick! While doing springs and shocks on Tom's 110 last month, we discovered the rear pads were worn to excess [just starting to score one disc] so we had to source and fit a set of standard pads ... The greenstuff rears had lasted just 15,000 miles Neutral

Checked the front 'just in case' ... they were just over half worn Guns and Landrovers .... anything else is irrelevant.
Post #251015 13th Jul 2013 6:24am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
geobloke



Member Since: 06 Nov 2012
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 4410

United Kingdom 
So toms rear pads are wearing much quicker than the fronts... Is that not concerning?? Shouldn't the brakes be biased to the front?

I will report back on the state of wear when I get the service done this week
Post #251051 13th Jul 2013 9:27am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
custom90



Member Since: 21 Jan 2010
Location: South West, England.
Posts: 20325

United Kingdom 
I too had on the standard pads I had changed the rears worn more than the fronts. Confused Since I've had Greenstuff pads fitted with standard calipers and discs and I would say they are better too even without disc upgrades.. I got my EBC pads from Dan @ Duckworth parts free delivery and IIRC slightly cheaper than Paddocks. Unless I'm thinking of something else. Either way there is no way I'd be going for standard pads again for OE or near OE. EBC every time now. â­ï¸â­ï¸God Bless the USA 🇬🇧🇺🇸 â­ï¸â­ï¸
Post #251055 13th Jul 2013 10:02am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Dave-H



Member Since: 08 Feb 2011
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1507

England 2007 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 HT Tonga Green
geobloke wrote:
So toms rear pads are wearing much quicker than the fronts... Is that not concerning?? Shouldn't the brakes be biased to the front?

I will report back on the state of wear when I get the service done this week


Not at all uncommon with 'discs all round' vehicles, most wear evenly each axle, a fair few wear quicker on the rears [Transits being one of the worse] ... i replace far more rear pads than fronts during my working week Neutral Guns and Landrovers .... anything else is irrelevant.
Post #251060 13th Jul 2013 10:22am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
geobloke



Member Since: 06 Nov 2012
Location: Nottinghamshire
Posts: 4410

United Kingdom 
Dave-H wrote:
geobloke wrote:
So toms rear pads are wearing much quicker than the fronts... Is that not concerning?? Shouldn't the brakes be biased to the front?

I will report back on the state of wear when I get the service done this week


Not at all uncommon with 'discs all round' vehicles, most wear evenly each axle, a fair few wear quicker on the rears [Transits being one of the worse] ... i replace far more rear pads than fronts during my working week Neutral


I was under the, obviously wrong, impression that the vast majority of the braking is meant to occur at the front axle. I was told by a mechanic that it was usually 60:40 biased to the front... A myth busted I guess...
Post #251063 13th Jul 2013 10:41am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
barbel jim



Member Since: 12 Dec 2012
Location: Northants
Posts: 1419

United Kingdom 2005 Defender 90 Td5 HT Tonga Green
geobloke wrote:

I was under the, obviously wrong, impression that the vast majority of the braking is meant to occur at the front axle. I was told by a mechanic that it was usually 60:40 biased to the front... A myth busted I guess...


Not at all...... look at the size difference between front and rear pads Wink and on most vehicles discs.......
Increased wear on commercials (transits) is down to the bias been altered when loaded, the more weight loaded the more the rear braking effect.
Post #251089 13th Jul 2013 2:57pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Post Reply
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 1
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums