↓ Advertise on Defender2 ↓

Home > Puma (Tdci) > Stock power limit
Post Reply  Down to end
Page 1 of 2 12>
Print this entire topic · 
ZeDefender



Member Since: 15 Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 4731

Germany 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Baltic Blue
Stock power limit
Quick question:

If the peak power is 122PS for all Pumas, is it limited passively or actively?
In other words, is the stock engine simply physically incapable of producing more peak power (in which case Pumas should vary quite a lot), or does the ECU actively choke it?

If power/torque are actively and precisely choked, presumably just fitting a bigger intercooler, turbo, EGR blank etc. with no remap won't have much noticeable effect...

Good morning to all
Matt Tell someone you love them today because life is short.
But shout it at them in German because life is also terrifying and confusing...
Post #173300 5th Oct 2012 7:16am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
T1G UP



Member Since: 08 Dec 2009
Location: Bath
Posts: 3101

England 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Orkney Grey
the ecu dictates the fuel...so the fuel dictates the power/ torque...upto a point.

plus there are quite a few obstacles that can easily be overcome to aid flow and as a result increase drivability / power / torque.

de cat, inlet tract, intercooler to name a few
Post #173303 5th Oct 2012 7:18am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ZeDefender



Member Since: 15 Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 4731

Germany 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Baltic Blue
So presumably, since I can read power/torque with the Scangauge, so can the ECU... and kill the fuel when it gets worried.
I wonder if bigger intercoolers etc. just help by "filling in" flatspots etc.

My theory is that the peak power/torque is ECU limited but hardware tuning gets you to the top faster. Personal experiences would help me get my head around it Confused Tell someone you love them today because life is short.
But shout it at them in German because life is also terrifying and confusing...
Post #173307 5th Oct 2012 7:28am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
K9F



Member Since: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 9610

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
Not sure if I've missed your point here but BHP and torque are increased with remaps above standard figures so that makes the engines capable of more?????

See below for examples:

http://www.james-french.co.uk/aftersales/l...r-upgrades If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!!

Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!!
Post #173308 5th Oct 2012 7:33am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ZeDefender



Member Since: 15 Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 4731

Germany 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Baltic Blue
Cheers.

I know that power/torque is LR-software limited and remaps can "allow" engine parameters like turbo pressure, fuel rail pressure to increase above LR-desired values, even with no hardware changes.

I'm wondering about the opposite: what happens if you beef up the hardware but keep the software the same?
How/does it change performance? Tell someone you love them today because life is short.
But shout it at them in German because life is also terrifying and confusing...
Post #173311 5th Oct 2012 7:41am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
K9F



Member Since: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 9610

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
I can only speak from personal experience and I do know that for example if you fit a decat pipe either on a remapped or stock vehicle that there is a noticable difference straight away on acceleration as it allows the turbo to 'spool up' quicker, so the answer would have to be yes....hardware can increase performance within standard software parameters. The decat is I would say the most 'cost effective' modification for increased performance in my opinion.

With regards to larger intercoolers, silicone hoses etc. I would be interested in feedback too on how different the vehicle is and if there are any significant gains to be had! If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!!

Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!!
Post #173314 5th Oct 2012 7:48am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ZeDefender



Member Since: 15 Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 4731

Germany 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Baltic Blue
Just heard from another member in a hot climate with no software mods.
Bigger intercooler makes massive difference to him (as expected from the hot weather point of view) but it also sounds as if it has significant effects on cooler days as well...

It seems as though fuel consumption improves, as though as better response and pulling under load. No absolute figures but it does sound as though even within LR's "cage" there is a lot of room for improvement.

So I'm just "Scangauging" different EGR blanking setups and then, eventually, an Allisport - still under warranty so have to be careful Rolling Eyes Tell someone you love them today because life is short.
But shout it at them in German because life is also terrifying and confusing...
Post #173321 5th Oct 2012 8:25am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
K9F



Member Since: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 9610

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
I 'threw caution to the wind' and carried out all my 'performance enhancing' mods whilst still under warranty after due consideration and a hell of a lot of research. EGR valve blanking, stainless exhaust getting rid of backbox, Autologic remap, decat etc. etc. No regrets there whatsoever. I did however retain all my original parts for the warranty period just for peace of mind and my companion 'Justin.'

'Just in' case. Laughing

I too would like an intercooler, pipes and possibly a hybrid turbo but have to refrain as I don't really do the current mileage to justify and with recent spending SWMBO must also be appeased somewhat.....

Embarassed Thumbs Up If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!!

Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!!
Post #173328 5th Oct 2012 8:45am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
JWL



Member Since: 26 Oct 2011
Location: Hereford
Posts: 3443

England 2002 Defender 110 Td5 SW Coniston Green
A bit off topic but I wasn't in a position at the time to experience anything. When the Td5 went from non cat to having a cat fitted from 2002 onwards to meet eu regs, was there a noticable change in performance? I only ask because de-catting mine made quite a difference.

Just curious after all this talk with the apparent differences with the latest tdci's.
Post #173329 5th Oct 2012 8:50am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Naks



Member Since: 27 Jan 2009
Location: Stellenbosch, ZA
Posts: 2646

South Africa 2010 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 SW Alpine White
Beyond the usual h/ware mods like de-cat, intercooler upgrade, etc., you have the s/ware remap, which also gives a power/torque boost

If you want to go beyond that, then you have to do some serious mods, like bigger turbo, new pistons, fuel pump, etc. But the durability is then on an inverse path to the power generated. --
2010 Defender Puma 90 + BAS remap + Alive IC + Slickshift + Ashcroft ATB rear
2015 Range Rover Sport V8 Supercharged



Defender Puma Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zZ1en9
Discovery 4 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zXrtKO
Range Rover/Sport L320/L322/L494 Workshop Manual: https://bit.ly/2zc58JQ
Post #173331 5th Oct 2012 8:56am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
adafish



Member Since: 30 Mar 2009
Location: atherstone
Posts: 1385

United Kingdom 1984 Defender 110 300 Tdi DCPU Stornoway Grey
you lot not read Porny's thread on here ? Whistle Putting Dreams on Drives at JLR Solihull..
Post #173347 5th Oct 2012 11:22am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ZeDefender



Member Since: 15 Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 4731

Germany 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Baltic Blue
Link please? Bow down
Couldn't find much concrete info on performance improvements/limits with better hardware but standard map Embarassed Tell someone you love them today because life is short.
But shout it at them in German because life is also terrifying and confusing...
Post #173354 5th Oct 2012 11:44am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
adafish



Member Since: 30 Mar 2009
Location: atherstone
Posts: 1385

United Kingdom 1984 Defender 110 300 Tdi DCPU Stornoway Grey
try this... Defender 2.2 Tuning/Remap from IRB developments! Putting Dreams on Drives at JLR Solihull..
Post #173355 5th Oct 2012 11:53am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
K9F



Member Since: 12 Nov 2009
Location: Bournemouth
Posts: 9610

United Kingdom 2008 Defender 90 Puma 2.4 XS CSW Stornoway Grey
adafish wrote:
you lot not read Porny's thread on here ? Whistle


adafish wrote:
try this... Defender 2.2 Tuning/Remap from IRB developments!


Laughing But the poster's got a 2.4 why would he read it.....
Also this thread isn't about mapping!

ZeDefender wrote:
I'm wondering about the opposite: what happens if you beef up the hardware but keep the software the same? How/does it change performance?



Without wishing to court controversy. There are loads of threads about remaps all professing by avid individuals to be the best (compared to what I don't know) but they are very rarely (if at all) backed up by facts and figures from a dyno...each vehicle is different I know but a before/after comparison against a standard one shouldn't be too difficult to produce.

Whistle

Back on topic....Again I suppose each vehicle is different and operate in differing climes but a clear concise explanation of what benefits for example an intercooler would afford the purchaser in layman's terms would for me be most welcome. Loads of people sell them without much explanation. If you go through life with your head in the sand....all people will see is an ar5e!!

Treat every day as if it is your last....one day you will be right!!


Last edited by K9F on 5th Oct 2012 12:09pm. Edited 1 time in total
Post #173356 5th Oct 2012 11:58am
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
ZeDefender



Member Since: 15 Sep 2011
Location: Munich
Posts: 4731

Germany 2011 Defender 110 Puma 2.4 SW Baltic Blue
Perhaps I should explain further: I have a terrific remap from Alive but I still get intermittent shaking of the vehicle. Gary has gone to a lot of trouble and done a great job but obviously my 110 doesn't want to play nice Rolling Eyes

Therefore, I want to find out what we can do to improve performance of a 2.4 without remapping and what that improvement will be, from personal experience... "in layman's terms", as the venerable gentleman put it Thumbs Up Tell someone you love them today because life is short.
But shout it at them in German because life is also terrifying and confusing...
Post #173364 5th Oct 2012 12:09pm
View user's profile Send private message View poster's gallery Reply with quote
Post Reply  Back to top
Page 1 of 2 12>
All times are GMT

Jump to  
Previous Topic | Next Topic >
Posting Rules
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
DEFENDER2.NET RSS Feed - All Forums