Home > Maintenance & Modifications > Triangular Blind Spot Window Set |
|
|
CyberCharlie Member Since: 01 Jul 2010 Location: Reading Posts: 140 |
Has someone tried to install these: http://www.devon4x4.com/index.php?page=sho...;Itemid=14
(I promise I have tried with the Search button this time ) |
||
21st Aug 2012 11:39am |
|
CyberCharlie Member Since: 01 Jul 2010 Location: Reading Posts: 140 |
measure twice cut once... this is normally my biggest weakness
From a legal perspective, am I allowed by the DVLA to cut holes in a car body where there was no hole before? I assume yes, but I prefer asking... |
||
21st Aug 2012 1:08pm |
|
mrandmrsh Member Since: 31 May 2010 Location: Huddersfield Posts: 692 |
The complexity here comes if it is a van and you have claimed the tax back. Adding side windows behind the driver will mean this needs to be considered. If it is just your motor you'll be fine (as long as you are not adding rear seats etc.) but it is a modification so your insurance will want to know.
HTH Craig 2015 110 USW XS in Santorini with premium contrast leather seats in tan/black, black headlining and with Dual Finish alloys (in the garage, now on Wolf rims with Goodyear MT/Rs) 2012 '62' 2.2 X-Tech 110 USW now gone ... 1984 90 soft top with full roll cage, 200 tdi engine etc now sold 2012 USW XS 2.2 "FUU" now gone.... |
||
21st Aug 2012 1:29pm |
|
ben_j85jty Member Since: 02 Sep 2008 Location: Bicester, Oxfordshire Posts: 491 |
From memory, the windows have to be of a certain size to get the HMRC excited about you not paying the right amount of tax, and those should be fine. 2002 Defender 110 DC
|
||
21st Aug 2012 1:36pm |
|
CyberCharlie Member Since: 01 Jul 2010 Location: Reading Posts: 140 |
Thanks guys!
|
||
21st Aug 2012 1:43pm |
|
blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 17539 |
Yes you can, and you can even put a window in the hole, though you may need to inform DVLA if you make anything they would consider a significant change. Fitting these windows would not be considered such. There is still, some twenty years after they ceased to have the slightest relevence, some confusion on side windows. The only relevence that rear side windows had was that vehicles with them used to attract a 10% Car Tax on purchase (or if retrofitted) and vehicles without them did not. The Car Tax (Abolition) Act of 1992 did away with this tax, and since then rear side windows have no effect whatsoever in this respect.
Not true, since the tax you claim back is VAT which has never had anything to do with windows per se. Conceivably if pre-1992 you'd claimed tax back on a commercial with no side windows, then fitted them and paid the car tax rendering the vehcile no longer commercial and therefore ineligible for input tax reclamation, you might have had a problem, but in this case it makes not a blind bit of difference.Good point re the insurance though, always tell them.
Not since 1992, see above. |
||
21st Aug 2012 2:38pm |
|
CyberCharlie Member Since: 01 Jul 2010 Location: Reading Posts: 140 |
Blackwolf, you are my newest favourite superhero
|
||
21st Aug 2012 2:45pm |
|
mrandmrsh Member Since: 31 May 2010 Location: Huddersfield Posts: 692 |
Mr Wolf, I don't like to disagree but....
The HMRC document here http://tinyurl.com/25wxml seems to suggest otherwise.
I really don't think you can legally buy a 90 hard top, put side windows in and still treat it as a van for VAT and Benefit in Kind Purposes. Once thing is for sure, it is not made simple...... 2015 110 USW XS in Santorini with premium contrast leather seats in tan/black, black headlining and with Dual Finish alloys (in the garage, now on Wolf rims with Goodyear MT/Rs) 2012 '62' 2.2 X-Tech 110 USW now gone ... 1984 90 soft top with full roll cage, 200 tdi engine etc now sold 2012 USW XS 2.2 "FUU" now gone.... |
||
21st Aug 2012 3:07pm |
|
CyberCharlie Member Since: 01 Jul 2010 Location: Reading Posts: 140 |
Guys to make to clear... I don't have my car registered as a van in fact I am paying an awful lot of road tax on it
|
||
21st Aug 2012 3:35pm |
|
blackwolf Member Since: 03 Nov 2009 Location: South West England Posts: 17539 |
Very interesting indeed, thank you, I stand corrected! However I didn't think that fitting side windows to a van caused it to stop being a van any more, not since the 1992 Car Tax (Abolition) Act. It certainly did before that. So I wonder if this is an anachronism left in the explanatory notes since 1992, or is still the case. Looking at your link, it seems that HMRC has completely different definitions of "car" and "commercial vehicle" to any road traffic legislation, so you may be driving something that is a van under C&U'86 but HMRC will tell you it's a car. Wonderful! Consider the statement "A car for VAT purposes is any motor vehicle of a kind normally used on public roads which has three or more wheels and either is constructed or adapted mainly for carrying passengers or has to the rear of driver’s seat roofed accommodation which is fitted with side windows or which is constructed or adapted for the fitting of side windows." What on earth does "constructed or adapted for the fitting of side windows" actually mean? It is absurd, undefined and undefinable! Who rights this rubbish? It all goes to show that no matter how careful you are as a vehicle operator there is now inevitably something you're doing wrong. Even the people who enfore the rules are baffled now (look at some of the confusion about speed limits, tachos, etc, and conflicting statements fomr VOSA and DVLA). We are drowning under pointless red tape, none of which serves any useful purpose. Ok, rant over, deep breaths. However returning to the OP's question, I seem to recall that one of the reasons why the triangular shape was first used for the extra windows in a Hardtop Landrover (well before they were called Defender) was because it actually wasn't behind the driver's seat, but alongside the driver's shoulder and thus OK for the car tax. |
||
21st Aug 2012 3:39pm |
|
|
All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2025 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis