 | Home > Puma (Tdci) > Comparison on Puma v FL2 performance |
 
|
|
|
| ickle Member Since: 22 Jul 2010 Location: South Vendee Posts: 1782   
|
we had a 08 fl2 with the 160bhp engine, it was like a rocket compared to my remapped 110 tdci.
Totally different beasts, the 110 is now a pleasure to drive loads of torque, less gear changes etc. & I'd recommend the BAS / IRB map to anyone, but I don't think you can compare the two drives. Keith |
||
16th Jan 2013 9:33pm |
|
| T1G UP Member Since: 08 Dec 2009 Location: Bath Posts: 3101  
|
i had a fl2 hse auto on loan for a month whilst they fixed te 110 and i was very impressed. why they cant fit that style engine and box in a defender i;ll never know
|
||
|
16th Jan 2013 9:58pm |
|
| willy eckerslike Member Since: 15 Jun 2009 Location: North yorks Posts: 1789  
|
We have the Freelander LE Sport SD4 195 BHP brilliant CAR not as versatile as the Defender but certainly a Land Rover success, had two so far and never had any problems all Original Member Pie n Pea Club.
110 HCPU Tipper |
||
|
16th Jan 2013 10:17pm |
|
| DAZ110 Member Since: 06 Dec 2007 Location: East Sussex Posts: 2039 
|
bm52,
My 110 has a BAS remap with speed limiter removed so your welcome to drive mine to see how it goes if you want. |
||
|
17th Jan 2013 8:45am |
|
| strang Member Since: 16 May 2012 Location: Happy Valley Posts: 1380 
|
The FL2 dash looks the same as a Puma dash, so you could always pretend..... Euro-Leafing to infinity and beyond.....
|
||
|
17th Jan 2013 12:47pm |
|
| bm52 Member Since: 04 Apr 2010 Location: Kent Posts: 2189 
|
Thanks for the replies. My family tell me the FL is not me and is too soft looking. My family seem to have been converted into proper Defender supporters without any real effort from me.
In summary - with a map it won't be as quick as a FL 150bhp but it will drive a lot better with improved flexibility, less gear changes and improved loaded hill climbing. Should be in a new job soon so once i've settled in it looks like i will be in the market for a map. Thanks for the advice 
Daz - hope to be in touch re that test drive ASAP. BM52 |
||
|
17th Jan 2013 2:37pm |
|
| DAZ110 Member Since: 06 Dec 2007 Location: East Sussex Posts: 2039
|
When ever you your ready.
You have PM |
||
|
17th Jan 2013 4:31pm |
|
| jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 8027  
|
LR2s are either 160 or 190bhp from my understanding.
its probably better across wet grassy fields than a def too! edited to add, have just looked it up, you are right they are 150bhp - 2.2eD4 (man), 2.2TD4 (man & auto) and 190 for 2.2 SD4(auto), 420Nm for all at 1750 sorry, was wrong. for comparioson 140bhp LR2 is 84bhp/T where as std Def 2(110) is 63bhp/T or remaped (assume 140bhp) then 73bhp/T (or 150bhp = 78bhp/T) i expect that is the more telling difference on driveavility with the Nm figure. Cheers James 110 2012 XS Utility 130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper 90 2010 Hardtop 90 M57 1988 Hardtop |
||
|
17th Jan 2013 9:09pm |
|
| Japseroony Member Since: 02 Jan 2008 Location: North East England Posts: 807 
|
You have to remember the Defender is a Ford engine and the Freelander is a Peugeot engine. Also, the defender is 2.5 tones and the Freelander is lighter, has a different gearbox and drive system
Gas, Grass Or Ass - Nobody Rides For Free
"UNDERSTEER" ----is when you hit the fence with the front of the car. "OVERSTEER" ------is when you hit the fence with the rear of the car. "HORSEPOWER" ----is how fast you hit the fence. "TORQUE" -----------is how far you take the fence with you. |
||
|
17th Jan 2013 10:18pm |
|
| bm52 Member Since: 04 Apr 2010 Location: Kent Posts: 2189
|
the FL is quite quick around town and general driving but it lacks oomph on steep motorway hills with even a moderate load, if I bought one I think I would get the 190bhp version. BM52
|
||
|
17th Jan 2013 10:55pm |
|
| LandRoverAnorak Member Since: 17 Jul 2011 Location: Surrey Posts: 11324
|
I'm surprised you say that. We use my wifes' TD4 to tow our large twin axle caravan and find it has plenty of grunt, although I do tend to put the gearbox in semi-auto mode and work the gears. Compared to my 110 it's faster and much more comfortable but the lighter weight does mean it's slightly more twitchy. If I'd never towed with a 110 then I probably wouldn't notice though.
The only real critisism I have of the FL is turbo lag when pulling awy from a standing start. It's ok when you're used to it but as I only drive ours sporadically, it always catches me out until I've adjusted to it  Darren
110 USW BUILD THREAD - EXPEDITION TRAILER - 200tdi 90 BUILD THREAD - SANKEY TRAILER - IG@landroveranorak "You came in that thing? You're braver than I thought!" - Princess Leia |
||
|
18th Jan 2013 10:12am |
|
| jst Member Since: 14 Jan 2008 Location: Taunton Posts: 8027
|
there is only 100kg or so in the weight of a 110 vs LR2. Cheers
James 110 2012 XS Utility 130 2011 M57 bespoke Camper 90 2010 Hardtop 90 M57 1988 Hardtop |
||
|
18th Jan 2013 10:24am |
|
|
|
| All times are GMT |
< Previous Topic | Next Topic > |
Posting Rules
|
Site Copyright © 2006-2024 Futuranet Ltd & Martin Lewis
